The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Cephalometric analysis of skeletal Class II malocclusion in Korean adults

한국 성인 골격성 II급 부정교합자의 측모두부규격 방사선 계측학적 연구

  • Kim, Kyung-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choy, Kwang-Chul (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yun, Hee-Sun (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 김경호 (연세대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 두개안면 기형연구소) ;
  • 최광철 (연세대학교 치과대학 교정학교실, 두개안면 기형연구소) ;
  • 윤희선 (연세대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2002.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate horizontal and vertical characteristics according to lateral cephalometry of adult Korean skeletal Class II patients using a selected horizontal and vortical reference planes of Koreans. 60 males and 60 females consisting of freshman of Yonsei University from 1996 to 1997 and patients with history of orthognatic surgery at the Dental Hospital of Yonsei University with a skeletal Class II profile were chosen and compared with 70 males and 70 females with normal occlusion. The skeletal Class R group had the following conditions : 1. Profile composed of a retrognathic mandible or protrusive maxilla; 2. Class II molar and canine key; 3. ANB-greater than $4^{\circ}; 4$. Wits appraisal-greater than 1.0mm; Cephalometric analysis consisted of 22 skeletal, 25 soft tissue, 12 dental measurements. The results were as follows. 1. There was no considerable vortical measurement difference between the skeletal Class II malocclusion group and the normal occlusion group in skeletal analysis. But, some variations were found between the two groups in soft tissue analysis. 2. Mandibular length of the skeletal Class II malocclusion group was smaller than that of the normal occlusion group. Mandible was more posteriorly positioned in the Class II malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. 3. The length and antero-posterior position of the maxilla were not different between the Class II malocclusion and the normal occlusion group. 4. The antero-posterior position of the nose, upper lip and maxillary soft tissue, and nasolabial angle were not different between the two groups. 5. Mandibular soft tissue of the Class H malocclusion group was more posteriorly positioned than that of the normal. 6. The vertical measurements of the incisors(U1-HP, L1-HP) were bigger in the Class II malocclusion group than in the normal, but those of the molars(U6-HP, U6-MP) showed no significant difference between the two groups. 7 Classifying the skeletal Class II malocclusion group according to the antero-posterior position of both jaws, normally positioned maxilla and retruded mandible was 43.3%, both normally positioned maxilla and mandible 28.3%, both retruded maxilla and mandible 20.0%..

교정치료의 목표는 좋은 안모 균형과 치열의 안정을 얻는 것이며 이를 위해서는 부정교합의 다양한 원인에 상응한 치료를 시행해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 성인 골격성 II급 부정교합자의 측모두부규격 방사선학적 특징을 조사하기 위하여 성인 정상교합자 140명(남 70명, 여 70명)과 성인 골격성 II급 부정교합자 120명(남 60명, 여 60명)의 측모두부규격 방사선사진을 촬영하였으며 계측결과를 바탕으로 골격 및 치아, 연조직 59개 항목을 평가하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 수직적 거리 계측치 및 고경 비율은 골격 분석에서는 정상교합군과 II급 부정교합군에서 차이가 없었으나 연조직 분석에서는 다소 차이를 보였다. 2. II급 부정교합군이 정상교합군에 비해 하악골 길이는 더 작았으며 더 후방에 위치하였다. 3. 상악골의 길이와 전후방적 위치는 II급 부정교합군과 정상교합군 간에 차이가 없었다. 4. 코, 상순, 상악 연조직 부위의 전후방적 위치와 Nasolabial angle은 정상교합군과 II급 부정교합군 간에 차이가 없었으며 하악 연조직의 전후방적 위치에서 뚜렷한 차이를 보였다. 5. 상하악 전치의 수직적 길이(U1-HP, L1-MP)는 II급 부정교합군이 정상교합군보다 더 컸으며 제1대구치에서는 두 군간 차이가 없었다. 6.상순에 대한 상악전치의 노출도(U1-Stms), 상악전치의 치축 각도(U1-HP)는 두 군간 차이가 없었으며 하악전치의 치축 각도(IMPA)는 II급 부정교합군이 정상교합군보다 더 컸다. 7. II급 부정 교합군의 안모 유형 분류에서, 상악골은 정상 위치 하고 하악골이 후방 위치하는 경우가 43.3%로 가장 많았으며, 상악골과 하악골이 모두 정상 위치하는 경우가 28.3%, 상악골과 하악골이 모두 후방 위치하는 경우는 20.0%였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 1969 : 55 : 109-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90122-5
  2. Sassouni V. A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalofacio- dental relationships. Am J Orthod 1955 : 41 : 735-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(55)90171-8
  3. Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960 : 46 : 330-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90047-6
  4. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931 : 1 : 45-66
  5. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952 : 22 : 142-5
  6. Hitchcock HP. A cephalometric description of Class II, division I malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1973 : 63: 414-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90146-2
  7. Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: An adjunct to ephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1978 : 73 : 61933
  8. Jacobson A. The 'Wits' appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975 : 67 : 125-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2
  9. McNamara JA. Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981 : 51 : 177-202
  10. Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Surgical orthodontic treatment. St. Louis: Mosby, 1991
  11. Amoric M. Etude critique des evaluations cephalometriques composant les Classes II d'Angle selon McNamara. Rev Orthop Dento Pac 1985 : 19 : 563-8 https://doi.org/10.1051/odf/1985033
  12. Blair ES. A Cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the skeletal morphology of Class I, Class II, Div. 1, and Class II, Div.2 (Angle) malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1954 : 24 : 106-19
  13. Altemus LA. Horizontal and vertical dentofacial relationships in normal and Class II division 1 malocclusion in girls 11-15 years. Angle Orthod 1955 : 25 : 120-37
  14. Rothstein TL. Facial morphology and growth from ten to fourteen years of age in children presenting Class II, Division 1 malocclusion : a comparative roentgenographic cephalometric study [thesis]. Pittsburgh : University of Pennsylvania, 1971.
  15. 김경호, 백형선, 김진갑. 한국성인의 측모두부 수평기준선에 관한 연구 대치교정지 1998 : 28 : 865-75
  16. 김경호, 최광철, 김형곤, 박광호. 악교정 수술을 위한 한국 성인 정상교 합자의 경조직 기준치 대구외과지 2001 : 27: 221-30
  17. 김경호, 최광철, 김진갑, 박광호. 악교정 수술을 위한 한국 성인 정상교 합자의 연조직 기준치 대구외과지 2001 : 27 : 231-8
  18. 부정교합백서발간위원회, 한국성인 정상교합자의 측모두부규격방사선 사진 계측 연구 결과보고서. 대한치과교정학회 1997
  19. Nahoum HI. Vertical Proportions and the palatal plane in anterioropen-bite. Am J Orthod 1971 : 59 : 273-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90100-X
  20. Opdebeeck H, Bell WH. The short face syndrome. Am J Orthod 1978: 73 : 499-511 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90240-3
  21. Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 1980 : 78 : 40420
  22. Wylie WL, Johnson EL. Rapid evaluation of facial dysplasia in the vertical plane. Angle Orthod 1952 : 22 : 165-82
  23. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA,Norton LA. Cephalometries for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978 : 36 : 269-77
  24. 이원유, 손병화. 한국 성인 정상교합자의 악안면 정상치에 관한 두부방 사선 계측학적 연구 대치교정지 1984 : 14 : 135-49
  25. 모덕진, 정규림. Angle II급 1류 부정교합의 안면두개골의 골격 특성에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1988 : 18 : 141-54
  26. Henry RG. A classification of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1957 : 27 : 83-92
  27. Renfroe EW. A study of the facial patterns associated with Class L ClassI II, division 1, and Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1948 : 18 : 12-5
  28. Drelich Re. A cephalometric study of untreated Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1948 : 18 : 70-5
  29. Adams JW, Cephalometric studies on the form of the human mandible. Angle Orthod 1948 : 18 : 8
  30. Craig CE. The skeletal patterns characteristicof Class I and Class II division 1 malocclusions in norma lateralis. Angle Orthod 1951 : 21 : 44-56
  31. 전윤옥, 이기수. 앵글 II급 1류 부정교합자의 안모유형에 관한 연구. 대치교정지 1989: 19 : 201-17
  32. 남통석, 정미향. 성인 II급 환자의 안면 수직고경 및 교합평면의 특정에 관한 두부방사선학적 연구. 대치교정지 1998 : 28 : 255-68
  33. Brodie AG. Late growth changes in the human face. Angle Orthod 1953 : 23 : 146-57
  34. Schudy FF. Cant of the occlusal plane and axial inclinations of teeth. Angle Orthod 1963 : 33 : 69-82
  35. Riedel RA. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1950 : 20: 168-78
  36. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967 : 53 : 262-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90022-X
  37. Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile changes in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 1972 : 61 : 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(72)90175-3
  38. Hambleton RS. The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod 1964 : 50 : 405-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(64)90204-0
  39. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the esthetic face. New York : Thieme-stratton Inc. 1984
  40. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980 : 38 : 744-51
  41. Robison JM, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo TG. Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form. Am J Orthod 1986 : 89 : 499-506 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90008-4
  42. Holdaway RA. Changes in relationship of point A and B during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1956 : 42 : 176-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(56)90112-9
  43. Baldridge Jp. Futher studies of the relation of the maxillary first permanent molars to the face in Class I and Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1980 : 20 : 3-10
  44. Rosenblum RE.Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion? Angle orthod 1995 : 65 : 49-62