전방 십자 인대 파열후 자가 슬개건을 이용한 재건술군과 부분 손상후 보존적 치료군의 비교

Comparison between Conservative Treatment of partial ACL Rupture and Reconstructive Surgery with BPTB Autograft in ACL Rupture

목적: 전방십자인대부분파열후보존적치료군과완전파열후자가슬개건을이용한재건술군간의기능적평가, 활동도및전방안정성을비교평가하고자하였다.대상및방법: 전방십자인대손상으로진단되고관절경으로진단치료한38명의환자를대상으로2년이상추시하였으며전방십자인대50$\%$이하파열된부분손상군1 2명(평균연령: 38.3세), 완전파열후자가슬개건을이용한재건술군26명(평균연령: 25.3세)을대상으로하였다. 객관적인안정성은KT-2000 Arthrometer를이용하여15lb와20lb전방전위부하로측정하였으며,기능평가는Lysholm score, 활동도는Tegner activity score를이용하여분석하였다.결과: Lysholm의기능평가는부분손상군은88.5, 재건술군은89.3이었고, Tegner의활동도는부분손상군5.3, 재건술군5.1이었다( P<0.05 ) .전방안정성에서평균전방전위는20lb 부하하에부분손상군에서건측에비해1.7$\pm$1.4 mm, 재건술군에서는건측에비해2.3$\pm$1.9 mm였으며(P<0.05), 15lb 부하하에서는부분손상군은건측에비해1.2$\pm$1.0 mm, 재건술군에서는건측에비해1.4$\pm$1.5 mm였다(P<0.05). 합병증으로관절부종, 불안정성, 전방슬관절동통이었다. 불안정성은부분손상군에서흔한합병증이었다.결론: 양군에서임상결과들은비슷하였으며, Lysholm의기능평가는양호하였고, Tegner 활동도상태는양군에서평균적으로신체적인적당한활동(조깅, 규칙적인자전거타기)은유지되어50$\%$이하의부분손상군에대한보존적치료는양호한결과가나타난것으로사료되었다.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the functional results, activity status, and anterior stability between conservative group with partial ACL injury and reconstruction group with bone-patellar ten-don-bone autograft in ACL total rupture. Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight patients with ACL injury were diagnosed and treated with arthroscopy and followed for more than two years. The number of patients with partial injury was 12(mean age; 38.3) and reconstruction group was 26 (mean age; 25.3). Objective stability was estimated under anterior loading of 15 lb and 20 lb by KT-2000 Arthrometer (MED metric, USA). Functional evaluation using Lysholm score and Tegner activity score were performed. Results: Average functional score of Lysholm was 88.5 in partial injury group and 89.3 in reconstruction group. Average score of Tegner was 5.3 in partial injury group and 5.1 in reconstruction group(P<0.05).Average anterior displacement compared with normal side. Under loading of 20lb, 1.7$\pm$4.3 mm in partial injury group, 2.3$\pm$1.9 mm in reconstruction group were anterior displaced (P<0.05). Under loading of 15lb, 1.2$\pm$1.0 mm in partial injury group, 1.4$\pm$1.5 mm in reconstruction group were dis-placed (P<0.05). There were giving way, effusion, instability and anterior knee pain in complication. Giving way was the frequent complication in the partial injury group. Conclusions: Clinical results of both group were similar. Functional evaluation of Lysholm was good and status of Tegner activity was maintained to physical fitness activites (jogging, regular bik-ing) in both groups on average. The results of conservative treatment for the partial ACL injury (less than 50$\%$) was satisfactory and equivalent to that of reconstructive treatment for the total ACL injury.