Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
- Volume 30 Issue 12
- /
- Pages.1394-1398
- /
- 2001
- /
- 2005-3711(pISSN)
- /
- 1598-7876(eISSN)
Effects of Continuous Intravenous Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia after Lumbar Spinal Surgery : A Prospective Study
요추부 수술 후 경막외 무통방법과 지속적 정맥 주입에 의한 통증 조절의 효과 비교
- Oh, Kyu Sung (Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Shin, Moon Soo (Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Gil, Hyun Joo (Department of Pundang CHA Hospital, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Hur, Ryoong (Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Choi, Hun Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Ahn, Jung Yong (Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesiology, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine) ;
- Kwon, Seong Oh (Department of Neurosurgery, Gumi CHA Hospital, Pochon CHA University College of Medicine)
- 오규성 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 신경외과학교실) ;
- 신문수 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 신경외과학교실) ;
- 길현주 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 마취과학교실) ;
- 허륭 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 신경외과학교실) ;
- 최훈규 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 신경외과학교실) ;
- 안정용 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 신경외과학교실) ;
- 권성오 (포천중문의과대학 구미차병원 신경외과학교실)
- Received : 2001.07.10
- Accepted : 2001.10.29
- Published : 2001.12.28
Abstract
Objective : The purpose of this non-randomized prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous intravenous nalbuphine-ketorolac-droperidol(CIA) versus continuous infusion of epidural morphine-bupivacaine(CEA) for pain control after lumbar spinal surgery. Methods : Twenty-one patients who underwent spine surgery including laminectomy, fusion with fixation were assigned to receive an intravenous bolus of nalbuphine 5mg and ketorolac 15mg, followed by a continuous infusion of nalbuphine 25mg, ketorolac 105mg, and droperidol 5mg mixed with normal saline 98cc(2cc/hr). Twenty patients received a bolus infusion of morphine 2mg and 0.125% bupivacaine 8cc followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 100cc 0.125% bupivacaine and morphine sulfate 8.0mg(2cc/hr). Pain score was measured on a visual analogue scale(VAS). It's safety and efficacies were compared with the results of continuous infusion of epidural morphine-bupivacaine, which was reported previously by same authors. A continuous infuser was used to give epidural morphine-bupivacaine and intravenous nalbuphine-ketorolac-droperidol. Results : In general, mild pain, pain less than 3 VAS scores, was observed postoperatively from 30minutes to 72hours in CEA group, and from 6 hours to 72 hours in CIA group. The early postoperative pain was controlled easily in 6 hours in CEA group, compared to CIA group(p<0.05). However, there was no statistical significance in 72 hours on pain scores between CEA and CIA groups after 6-12hours of pain managements. Pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention were more frequent in CEA group. Conclusion : CIA and CEA are considered effective methods in postoperative pain managements. However, adequate doses in early intravenous infusion and continuous intravenous analgesia with nalbuphine-ketorolac-droperidol will be needed for better control in early postoperative pain with less side effects.
Keywords
- Epidural anesthesia;
- Intravenous anesthesia;
- Nalbuphine;
- Ketorolac;
- Droperidol;
- Lumbar spinal surgery