DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Computer simulation for dynamic wheel loads of heavy vehicles

  • Published : 2001.10.25

Abstract

The characteristics of dynamic wheel loads of heavy vehicles running on bridge and rigid surface are investigated by using three-dimensional analytical model. The simulated dynamic wheel loads of vehicles are compared with the experimental results carried out by Road-Vehicles Research Institute of Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) to verify the validity of the analytical model. Also another comparison of the analytical result with the experimental one for Umeda Entrance Bridge of Hanshin Expressway in Osaka, Japan, is presented in this study. The agreement between the analytical and experimental results is satisfactory and encouraging the use of the analytical model in practice. Parametric study shows that the dynamic increment factor (DIF) of the bridge and RMS values of dynamic wheel loads are fluctuated according to vehicle speeds and vehicle types as well as roadway roughness conditions. Moreover, there exist strong dominant frequency resemblance between bounce motion of vehicle and bridge response as well as those relations between RMS values of dynamic wheel loads and dynamic increment factor (DIF) of bridges.

Keywords

References

  1. Agabein, M.E. (1971), "The effect of various damping assumption on the dynamic response of structures", Bulletin of International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 8, 217-236.
  2. Biggs, J.M. (1982), "Introduction to structural dynamics", McGraw-Hill, 315-327.
  3. Billing, J.R. (1984), "Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario", CSCE J. of Civ. Eng., II, 833-843.
  4. Cantieni, R. (1984), "Dynamic load testing of highway bridges", IABSE Proceedings, P-75/84, 57-72.
  5. Cantieni, R. (1992), "Dynamic behavior of highway bridges under the passage of heavy vehicles", EMPA Report, No.220.
  6. Fafard, M., Mallikarjuna, and Savard, M. (1993), "Dynamics of bridge-vehicle interactions", Proc. of Structural Dyanmics-EURODYN'93, 951-960.
  7. Huang, T. (1976), "Vibration of bridges", Shock Vibr., Dig., 8, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310247600800312
  8. Inbahathan, M.J., and Wieland, M. (1987), "Bridge vibrations due to vehicle moving over rough surface", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 113(9), 1994-2008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:9(1994)
  9. ISO (1972), "Proposals for generalized road inputs to vehicles", ISO/DIS2631, 1-7.
  10. Kawatani, M., Nishiyama, S., and Yamada, Y. (1993), "Dynamic response analysis of highway bridges under moving vehicle", Technical Report of the Osaka Univ., 43(2137), 109-118.
  11. Kawatani, M., and Kim, C.W. (1998), "Effects of gap at expansion joint on traffic-induced vibration of highway bridge", CSCE Proc. of Developments in Short and Medium Span Bridge Engineering'98, I, 285-294.
  12. Kim, S., and Nowak, A.S. (1995), "Load distribution and impact factors for I-girder bridges", ASCE J. Bridge Eng., 2(3), 97-104.
  13. Mulcathy, N.L. (1983), "Bridge response with tractor-trailer vehicle loading", Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 11, 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110505
  14. Nassif, H.N., and Nowak, A.S. (1995), "Dynamic load spectra for girder bridge", Transportation Research Record, 1476, 69-83.
  15. Page, J. (1976), "Dynamic wheel load measurements on motorway bridges", TRRL Laboratory Report 722.
  16. Yang, Y.B., Yau, J.D., and Hsu, L.C. (1997), "Vibration of simple beams due to trains moving at high speeds", Eng. Struct., 19(11), 936-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00001-1
  17. Zienkiwicz, O.C., and Taylor, R.L. (1991), The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, 1, 2.

Cited by

  1. Dynamic response analysis of monorail bridges under moving trains and riding comfort of trains vol.27, pp.14, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.014
  2. Dynamic response of a monorail steel bridge under a moving train vol.294, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.12.028
  3. Coupling vibration of vehicle-bridge system vol.25, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437522
  4. An analytical approach to train-induced site vibration around Shinkansen viaducts vol.6, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802087799
  5. Seismic response of a monorail bridge incorporating train-bridge interaction vol.26, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.26.2.111
  6. Reduction of traffic-induced vibration of two-girder steel bridge seated on elastomeric bearings vol.26, pp.14, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.08.002
  7. Vehicle-bridge coupled vibrations in different types of cable stayed bridges vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-015-0306-x
  8. Vibration analysis of a multi-span continuous bridge subject to complex traffic loading and vehicle dynamic interaction vol.20, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0358-4
  9. Hybrid Model for Railroad Bridge Dynamics vol.142, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001530
  10. The Impact Analysis of Tire Parameter for Tire Wear When Monorail Vehicle Curve Driving vol.470, pp.1662-7482, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.470.529
  11. Dynamic Response of a Long-Span Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Tied Arch Bridge and the Riding Comfort of Monorail Trains vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040650
  12. 노면 요철을 고려한 AGT 차량의 동적 응답 해석 vol.12, pp.12, 2001, https://doi.org/10.5050/ksnvn.2002.12.12.986