DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk evaluation of steel frames with welded connections under earthquake

  • Song, Jianlin (Applied Insurance Research) ;
  • Ellingwood, Bruce R. (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology)
  • Published : 2001.06.25

Abstract

Numerous failures in welded connections in steel moment-resisting building frames (SMRF) were observed when buildings were inspected after the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. These observations raised concerns about the effectiveness of such frames for resisting strong earthquake ground motions. The behavior of SMRFs during an earthquake must be assessed using nonlinear dynamic analysis, and such assessments must permit the deterioration in connection strength to capture the behavior of the frame. The uncertainties that underlie both structural and dynamic loading also need to be included in the analysis process. This paper describes the analysis of one of approximately 200 SMRFs that suffered damage to its welded beam-to-column connections from the Northridge Earthquake is evaluated. Nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of this SMRF in the time domain is performed using ground motions representing the Northridge Earthquake. Subsequently, a detailed uncertainty analysis is conducted for the building using an ensemble of earthquake ground motions. Probability distributions for deformation-related limit states, described in terms of maximum roof displacement or interstory drift, are constructed. Building fragilities that are useful for condition assessment of damaged building structures and for performance-based design are developed from these distributions.

Keywords

References

  1. BSSC (1998), "NEHRP recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings (1998)", Building Seismic Safety Council, Vols. 1 and 2, prepared for and issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  2. Ellingwood, B. (1998), "Reliability-based performance concept for building construction." Struct. Eng. Worldwide 1998, Paper T178-4, Elsevier (CD-ROM).
  3. Gross, J.L. (1998), "A connection model for the seismic analysis of welded steel moment frames," Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00090-4
  4. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000), "Behavior of ductile SMRFs at various seismic hazard levels." J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 12691, 98-107.
  5. Imam, R.L., and Conover, W.J. (1980), "Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment," Communications in Statistics, A9(17), 1749-1842.
  6. Kennedy, R.P., and Ravindra, M.K. (1984), "Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant studies," Nuc. Eng. and Des., 79(1), 47-68, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(84)90188-2
  7. Kunnath, S.K. (1995), "Enhancements to program IDARC: Modeling inelastic behavior of welded connections in steel moment-resisting frames," NIST GCR 95-673, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.
  8. Luco, N., and Cornell, C.A. (2000), "Effects of connection fractures on smrf seismic drift demands," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 126(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(127)
  9. Luco, N., and Cornell, C.A. (1997), "Numerical example of the proposed SAC procedure for assessing the annual exceedance probabilities of specified drift demands and of drift capacity," SAC Report, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
  10. O'Connor, J.M., and Ellingwood, B.R. (1987), "Reliability of nonlinear structures with seismic loading," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 113(5), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:5(1011)
  11. SAC Joint Venture (1996). "Experimental investigations of beam-column subassemblages." Report No. SAC-96- 01, Parts 1 and 2, SAC Joint Venture (CUREe), Sacramento, CA.
  12. Shome, N., and Cornell, C.A. (1998) "Normalization and scaling accelerograms for nonlinear structural analysis," Proc. 6th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
  13. Song, J. (1998), "Seismic reliability evaluation of steel frames with damaged welded connections," Ph.D. Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
  14. Song, J., and Ellingwood, B.R. (1999), "Seismic reliability of special moment steel frames with welded connections: I and II," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 125(4), 357-384. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(357)
  15. Uang, C.M., Yu, Q.S., Sadre, A., Bonowitz, D., and Youssef, N. (1995), "Performance of a 13-story steel moment-resisting frame damaged in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake," SSRP-95-04, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  16. Wen, Y.K., and Foutch, D.A. (1997), "Proposed statistical and reliability framework for comparing and evaluating predictive models for evaluation and design, and critical issues in developing such framework," Report No. SAC/BD-97/03, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.

Cited by

  1. The Role of Fragility Assessment in Consequence-Based Engineering vol.21, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1979502
  2. Energy-based design of structures using modified force analogy method vol.12, pp.5, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.234