Detection of Malignant Primary Hepatic Neoplasms with Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) Enhanced T1-Weighted Hepatocyte Phase MR Imaging: Results of Off-site Blinded Review in a Phase-II Multicenter Trial

  • Constantino S. Pena (Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Sanjay Saini (Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School) ;
  • Richard L. Baron (Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh) ;
  • Bernd A. Hamm (Department of Radiology, Charite Charite Hospital, Humboldt University) ;
  • Giovanni Morana (Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico di Borgo Roma) ;
  • Roberto Caudana (Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico di Borgo Roma) ;
  • Andrea Giovagnoni (Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Oncologiche e Radiologiche, Universita degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia) ;
  • Andrea Villa (Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico San Matteo) ;
  • Alessandro Carriero (Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche e Formazione dell'Imagine, Ospedale Santissima Annunziata) ;
  • Didier Mathieu (Service de Radiologie, Hopital Henri Mondor) ;
  • Michael W. Bourne (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Wales) ;
  • Miles A. Kirchin (Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Bracco SpA) ;
  • Gianpaolo Pirovano (Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Bracco SpA) ;
  • Alberto Spinazzi (Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Bracco SpA)
  • Received : 2001.04.02
  • Accepted : 2001.09.05
  • Published : 2001.12.31

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (GdBOPTA) enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver lesions in patients with primary malignant hepatic neoplasms. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one patients with histologically proven primary malignancy of the liver were evaluated before and after administration of GdBOPTA at dose 0.05 or 0.10 mmol/kg. T1-weighted spin echo (T1W-SE) and gradient echo (T1W-GRE) images were evaluated for lesion number, location, size and confidence by three off-site independent reviewers and the findings were compared to reference standard imaging (intraoperative ultrasound, computed tomography during arterial portography or lipiodol computed tomography). Results were analyzed for significance using a two-sided McNemar's test. Results: More lesions were identified on Gd-BOPTA enhanced images than on unenhanced images and there was no significant difference in lesion detection between either concentration. The largest benefit was in detection of lesions under 1 cm in size (7 to 21, 9 to 15, 16 to 18 for reviewers A, B, C respectively). In 68% of the patients with more than one lesion, Gd-BOPTA increased the number of lesions detected. Conclusion: Liver MR imaging after Gd-BOPTA increases the detection of liver lesions in patients with primary malignant hepatic neoplasm.

Keywords

References

  1. Miller WJ, Baron RL, Dodd GD III, Federle MP. Malignancies in patients with cirrhosis: CT sensitivity in 200 consecutive transplant patients. Radiology 1994;193:645-650 
  2. Dodd GD III, Miller WJ, Baron RL, Skolnick ML, Campbell WL. Detection of malignant tumors in end-stage cirrhotic livers: Efficacy of sonography as a screening technique. AJR 1992;159:727-733 
  3. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Sugarbaker PH, Bernadino ME. Hepatic tumors: Comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation. Radiology 1989;171:47-51 
  4. Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. AJR 1994;163:323-331 
  5. Taourel PG, Pageaux GP, Coste V, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: detection with CT after injection of iodized oil. Radiology 1995;197:377-380 
  6. Manfredi R, Maresca G., Baron RL, et al. Gadobenate Dimeglumine [BOPTA] enhanced MR imaging: Patterns of enhancement in normal liver and cirrhosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:862-867 
  7. Caudana R, Morana G, Pirovano GP, et al. Focal malignant hepatic lesions: MR imaging enhanced with gadolinium Benzyloxypropoinictetra- acetate (BOPTA)- Preliminary results of phase II clinical application. Radiology 1996;199:513-520 
  8. Vogl TJ, Stupavsky A, Pegios W, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Evaluation with dynamic and static Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1997;205:721-728 
  9. Murakami T, Baron RL, Peterson MS, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: MR imaging with Mangafodipir Trisodium. Radiology 1996;200:69-77 
  10. Petersein J, Spinazzi A, Giovagnoni A, et al. Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging- a multicenter phase III clinical study. Radiology 2000;215:727-736 
  11. Kirchin MA, Pirovano G, Spinazzi A. Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA): an overview. Invest Radiol 1999;33:798-809 
  12. Vittadini G, Felder E, Musu C, Tirone C. Preclincial profile of Gd-BOPTA; a liver specific MRI contrast agent. Invest Radiol 1990;5:559-560 
  13. De Haen C, Gozzini L. Soluble-type hepatobiliary contrast agents for MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:179-183 
  14. Spinazzi A, Lorusso V, Pirovano G, Taroni P, Kirchin M, Davies A. MultiHance clinical pharmacology: biodistribution and MR enhancement of the liver. Acad Radiol 1998;5(S):86-89 
  15. Spinazzi A, Lorusso V, Pirovano G, Kirchin M. Safety, tolerability, biodistribution and MR enhancement of the liver with GdBOPTA: results of clinical pharmacology and pilot imaging studies in non-patient and patient volunteers. Acad Radiol 1999;6:282-291 
  16. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, McMahon C, Balzer J, et al. Gadobenate Dimeglumine- a new contrast agent for MR imaging: Preliminary evaluation in healthy volunteers. AJR 1992;158:887-892 
  17. Rosati G, Pirovano G, Spinazzi A. Interim results of phase II clinical testing of Gadobenate Dimeglumine. Invest Radiol 1994;29(S):183-185 
  18. Slater GJ, Saini S, Mayo-Smith W, Sharma P, et al. Mn-MPDP enhanced MR imaging of the liver: analysis of pulse sequence performance. Clin Radiol 1996;51:484-486 
  19. Peterson MS, Baron RL, Murakami T. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:337-345 
  20. Hamm B, Mahfouz AE, Taupitz M, et al. Liver metastases: improved detection with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging? Radiology 1997;202:677-682