Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제2권3호
  • /
  • Pages.159-163
  • /
  • 2001
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지

Hypoechoic Rim of Chronically Inflamed Prostate, as Seen at TRUS: Histopathologic Findings

  • Hak Jong Lee (Department of Radiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Cheil Hospital) ;
  • Ghee Young Choe (Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC) ;
  • Chang Gyu Seong (Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung Hyup Kim (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC)
  • 투고 : 2001.03.20
  • 심사 : 2001.08.02
  • 발행 : 2001.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study is to correlate the findings of peripheral hypoechoic rim, seen at transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in chronic prostatitis patients, with the histopthologic findings. Materials and Methods: Seven patients with pathologically proven chronic prostatitis were involved in this study. The conspicuity of the peripheral hypoechoic prostatic rim, seen at TRUS, was prominent and subtle, and to determine its histopathologic nature, the microscopic findings were reviewed. Results: In five of seven cases (71%), TRUS demonstrated a prominent peripheral hypoechoic rim. Microscopic examination revealed that inflammatory cell infiltration of prostatic glandular tissue was severe in three cases (42.9%), moderate in two (28.6%), and minimal in two (28.6%). In all seven cases, the common histopathologic findings of peripheral hypoechoic rim on TRUS were loose stromal tissues, few prostatic glands, and sparse infiltration by inflammatory cells. Conclusion: The peripheral hypoechoic rim accompanying prostatic inflammation and revealed by TRUS reflects a sparsity of prostate glandular tissue and is thought to be an area in which inflammatory cell infiltration is minimal.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Griffiths GJ, Crooks AJR, Roberts EE, et al. Ultrasonic appearances associated with prostatic inflammation: a preliminary study. Clin Radiol 1984;35:343-345  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(84)80168-3
  2. Doble A, Carter S. Ultrasonographic findings in prostatitis. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:763-770  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01810-3
  3. Burks DD, Drolshagen LF, Fleischer AC, Liddelle HT, McDougal WS, Karl EM, James AEJr. Transrectal sonography of benign and malignant prostatic lesions. AJR 1986;146:1187-1191  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.146.6.1187
  4. Langer JE. The current role of transrectal ultrasonography in the evaluation of prostatic carcinoma. Semin Roentgenol 1999;4:284-294  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-198X(99)80006-6
  5. Walsh PC. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Walsh PC, eds. Campbell's Urology, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders 1992:1009-1027 
  6. Collins MM, Stafford RS, O'lwary MP. How common is prostatitis? A national survey of physician visits . J Urol 1998;159:1224-1228  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63564-X
  7. Wasserman NF. Prostatitis: Clinical presentations and transrectal ultrasound findings. Semin Roentgenol 1999;4:325-330  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-198X(99)80009-1
  8. Rifkin MD. Endorectal sonography of the prostate: Clinical implications. AJR 1987;148:1137-1142  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.148.6.1137
  9. McNeal JE. Origin and development of carcinoma in the prostate. Cancer 1969;23: 24-31  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196901)23:1<24::AID-CNCR2820230103>3.0.CO;2-1
  10. McNeal JE. Normal and pathologic anatomy of the prostate. Urology 1969;17:11-17 
  11. Grossfeld GD, Coakley FV. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Clinical overview and value of diagnostic imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:31-47  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70148-2
  12. Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ. The prostatic capsule: Does it exist? Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:21-27  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198901000-00003