A Prognosis Evaluation after Iliac Bone Graft in Cleft Alveolus Patients

치조열 환자의 장골이식술 후 예후 평가

  • Hong Jin-Ho (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry and Research Institute of Speech Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Soh Byung-Soo (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry and Research Institute of Speech Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Baik Jin-Ah (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry and Research Institute of Speech Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Shin Hyo-Keun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry and Research Institute of Speech Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 홍진호 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학 교실) ;
  • 소병수 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학 교실) ;
  • 백진아 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학 교실) ;
  • 신효근 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학 교실)
  • Published : 2001.12.01

Abstract

Alveolar cleft exists in 75% of cleft patients, In alveolar cleft patients, alar base is widening, palatal fistular formation, maxillary growth disturbance & tooth loss of adjacent area is raised, Alveolar bone grafting, especially iliac bone grafting, is a general treatment method. As operation timing, bone grafting is classified with primary, early secondary, secondary, & late secondary, Here we report cleft width, marginal bone height, bone resorption rate, grafted shape & bone densities after secondary iliac bone grafting was done in the Dept. of oral and maxillofacial surgery of chonbuk national university hospital. We compared cleft width to bone resorption rate and grafted shape. Also, alveolar bone densities of grafted and contralateral site was compared with Emago 3 package? (Oral Diagonostic System, The Netherlands), The data obtained were analyzed using Spearman's rho coefficients and sign test with SPSS for window, The results were obtained as follows. 1. As alveolar cleft width is increase, bone resorption rate is, too. This relation showed significant difference(P<.01). 2, In proximal & distal area, alvolar cleft width and bone graft contour after bone grafting had a reverse proportional difference. It was not significant difference(P>.05). 3. After 3 month, in bone density results by using Emago 3 package? with periapical standard view, occlusal view & panoramic view, differences between grafted bone and alveolar bone of contralateral site didn't show a significant difference(P>.05). Thus, differences of bone densities in the alveolar bones didn't exist.

Keywords