Micro-imaging techniques for evaluation of plastic microfluidic chip

  • Kim, Jung-Kyung (Biomedlab Co.) ;
  • Hyunwoo Bang (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Yongku (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chanil Chung (Digital Bio Technology Co.) ;
  • Yoo, Jung-Yul (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Sang-Sik (School of Electronics Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Seung (School of Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Sekwang (School of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Chang, Jun-Keun (School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, seoul National University)
  • Published : 2001.12.01

Abstract

The Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter (FACS) is a well-established instrument used for identifying, enumerating, classifying and sorting cells by their physical and optical characteristics. For a miniaturized FACS device, a disposable plastic microchip has been developed which has a hydrodynamic focusing chamber using soft lithography. As the characteristics of the spatially confined sample stream have an effect on sample throughput, detection efficiency, and the accuracy of cell sorting, systematic fluid dynamic studies are required. Flow visualization is conducted with a laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), and three-dimensional flow structure of the focused sample stream is reconstructed from 2D slices acquired at $1\mutextrm{m}$ intervals in depth. It was observed that the flow structure in the focusing chamber is skewed by unsymmetrical velocity profile arising from trapezoidal cross section of the microchannel. For a quantitative analysis of a microscopic flow structure, Confocal Micro-PIV system has been developed to evaluate the accelerated flow field in the focusing chamber. This study proposes a method which defines the depth of the measurement volume using a detection pinhole. The trajectories of red blood cells (RBCs) and their interactions with surrounding flow field in the squeezed sample stream are evaluated to find optimal shape of the focusing chamber and fluid manipulation scheme for stable cell transporting, efficient detection, and sorting

Keywords

References

  1. M. R. Melamed, T. Lindmo, and M. L. Mendelsohn, 'Flow cytometry and sorting,' 2nd Ed., Wiley-Liss, New York, 1990
  2. A. Y. Fu, C. Spence, A. Scherer, F. H. Arnold, and S. R. Quake, 'A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter,' Nature Biotech., vol. 17, pp. 1109-1111, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1038/15095
  3. D. P. Schrum, C. T. Culbertson, S. C. Jacobson, and J. M. Ramsey, 'Microchip flow cytometry using electrokinetic focusing,' Anal. Chem., vol. 71, pp. 4173-4177, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990372u
  4. J. P. Brody, P. Yager, R. E. Goldstein, and R. H. Austin, 'Biotechnology at low Reynolds numbers,' Biophys. J., vol. 71, pp. 3430-3441, 1996
  5. J. G. Santiago, S. T. Wereley, C. D. Meinhart, D. J. Beebe, and R. J. Adrian, 'A particle image velocimetry system for microfluidics,' Exp. Fluids, vol. 25, pp. 316-319, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050235
  6. C. D. Meinhart, S. T. Wereley, and J. G. Santiago, 'PIV measurements of a micro channel flow,' Exp. Fluids, vol. 27, pp. 414-419, 1999
  7. C. D. Meinhart and H. Zhang, 'The flow structure inside a microfabricated inkjet printhead,' J MEMS, vol. 9, pp. 67-75, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/84.825779
  8. M. G. Olsen, J. M. Bauer, and D. J. Beebe, 'Particle imaging technique for measuring the deformation rate of hydrogel microstructures,' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 76, pp. 3310-3312, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.126635
  9. E. B. Cummings, 'An image processing and optimal nonlinear filtering technique for particle image velocimetry of microflows,' Exp. Fluids, vol. 29, pp. S42-S50, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480070006
  10. M. G. Olsen and R. J. Adrian, 'Brownian motion and correlation in particle image velocimetry,' Optic. & Laser Tech., vol. 32, pp. 621-627, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-3992(00)00119-5
  11. C. D. Meinhart, S. T. Wereley, and M. H. B. Gary, 'Volume illumination for two-dimensional particle image velocimetry,' Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, pp. 809-814, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/326
  12. M. G. Olsen and R. J. Adrian, 'Out-of-focus effects on particle image visibility and correlation in microscopic particle image velocimetry,' Exp. Fluids, vol. 29, pp. S166-S174, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480070018
  13. Y. Xia and G. M. Whitesides, 'Soft lithography,' Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci, vol. 28, pp. 153-184, 1998
  14. S. C. Jacobson and J. M. Ramsey, 'Electrokinetic focusing in microfabricated channel structures,' Anal. Chem., vol. 69, pp. 3212-3217, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac961093z
  15. D. L. Hitt and M. L. Lowe, 'Confocal imaging of flows in artificial venular bifurcations,' J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 121, pp. 170-177, 1999
  16. J. B. Knight, A. Vishwanath, J. P. Brody, and R. H. Austin, 'Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: mixing nanoliters in microseconds,' Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp.3863-3866, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3863