THE COMPARISON OF MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS V COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS WITH VARIOUS DENTIN BONDING SYSTEMS

5급 와동에서 수종의 상아질 접착제에 따른 미세누출의 비교

  • Lim, Yeon-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Ju (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hur, Bock (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 임연희 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이희주 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 허복 (부산대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2001.03.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate microleakage of six current dentin bonding systems. In this in vitro study, class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of thirty extracted human molars. Each margin was on enamel and dentin/cementum. Experimental teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 5 each. Group 1 : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose; Group 2 : Single Bond; Group 3 : Prime&Bond NT ; Group 4 : Clearfil Liner Bond 2 ; Group 5 : MAC Bond II ; Group 6 : One-up Bond F. The bonding agent and composite resin were applied to class V cavities according to manufacturer's directions. After thermocycling, the specimens were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye solution for 6 hours and sectioned longitudinally through the center of the restoration with a low speed diamond saw. The degree of microleakage was measured as the extent of dye penetration under the stereomicroscope at $\times$20. The data were analyzed using one way ANOVA. When significant differences found. multiple comparisons were made using Duncan's Multiple Range Test. The results of this study were as follows: 1. In all groups, leakage value seen at the enamel margin was significantly lower than that seen at the dentin margin(P<0.001). 2. At the enamel margin, none of the dentin bonding systems used in this study showed statistically significant difference in leakage values(P<0.05). 3. At the cementum margin, group 3 showed the highest leakage value, and others were decreased as group 5, 6, 4 in that order, and group 1, 2 showed the lowest leakage value. There was statistically significant difference between group 3 and the other groups except for group 5(P<0.05).

Keywords