Review of Debate over the Expansion of Public Medical Facilities to Enhance the Public Role in the Medical Care Sector

의료의 공공성제고와 공공의료기관 확충 논의의 검토

  • Published : 2001.03.01

Abstract

During the last year, we had a very severe situation with the strike of physicians working in medical facilities. From that time, many politicians and scholars insisted on the expansion of public hospitals to enhance the public role in the medical care sector. They think that private medical facilities work for profit motivation and that the high proportion of private to whole facilities is an obstacle to the public function of medical care under social insurance system. They found that one of the reasons for failing to prevent the physicians' strike was the high proportion of private facilities. Others insisted that the strike was not a good reason for the expansion of public hospitals. The physicians' strike was a very rare case, and it is not a good basis for generalization of the discussion of public hospitals. Last year almost all apprentice physicians in public facilities took part in the strike, and consequently the public hospitals also lost the role of public function. They view this increasing involvement of government in the medical sector as improper and the cause of inefficiencies. In this paper we review the debate over the expansion of public facilities. To clarify the debate, we review traditional criteria for the role of government in a market system and to apply these criteria to medical care. There are two traditional areas where government Is acknowledged to have a role in a market system: market imperfections and market failure. Where market imperfections and market failure exist, there may be a role for government. The justifications for government intervention are consumer protection and the existence of externalities. One of externalities is to provide medical care for the poor. The appropriate measures to provide medical owe to the poor can be sought in both demand and supply side subsidies. National health insurance is a method of demand subsidies and establishment of public hospitals is a method of supply side subsidies. Under the National Health Insurance System, the expansion of public hospitals is not an appropriate subsidy policy.

Keywords

References

  1. 조선일보
  2. 제215회 정기국회 국정감사 정책제안서 공공보건의료 인프라 확충방안 김성순
  3. 건강보장연구 v.4 국민의료의 효율화를 위한 의료개혁 방향 이규식
  4. 국민의료비 산출보형 개발 및 추계 정영호(등)
  5. Health Care Economics(5th ed.) Feldstein PJ
  6. Micro Economic Theory Layard PRG;Walters AA
  7. Finance in Theory and Practice Musgrave RA;Musgrave PB
  8. Private Health Sector Growth in Asia Newbrander W(ed.)
  9. White Paper NHS Executive
  10. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science no.Autumn Theories of Economic Regulation Posner RA
  11. Health Economics: Theories, Insights, and Industry Studies Santerre RE;Neum SP
  12. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science v.2 no.1 The Theory of Economic Regulation Stigler GJ
  13. European Series no.72 European Health Care Reform, Analysis of Current Strategies WHO