Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research (대한의용생체공학회:의공학회지)

The Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering (대한의용생체공학회)
권호 표지

Measurement of Ground Reaction Force and Energy Consumption for Ankle Assembly (Fixed-axis , Single-axis , Multi-axis Type) of Trans-Tibial Amputee

하퇴의지착용자에 대한 인공족관절 유형(고정형, 단축형, 다축형)에 따른 지면반발력 및 에너지 소모의 측정

  • 김성민 (한국보건산업진흥원 의약산업단) ;
  • 배하석 (연세대학교 의과대학 재활의학과) ;
  • 박창일 (연세대학교 의과대학 재활의학과)
  • Published : 2001.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, ground reaction force(GRF) and energy consumption of fixed. single-axis and multi-axis Prosthetic ankle assemblies were investigated to show the biomechanical evaluation for trans-tibial amputees. In the experiments. two male and two female trans-tibial amputees were tested with fixed, sin91e-axis and multi-axis Prosthetic ankle assembly. A three-dimensional gait analysis was carried out to derive the ratio of GRF to weight as the percentage of total stance Phase for nine Points Energy consumption of each Prosthetic ankle assembly was measured while subjects walked at 2km/h. 3km/h and the most comfortable walking speed on the treadmill The results showed that multi-axis ankle was superior to the other two ankle assemblies for the characteristic of forwarding and breaking forces. Fixed ankle was relatively superior to the other two ankle assemblies for gait balancing and movement of the center fur mass Compared to the other ankle assembly. sing1e-axis type showed lower energy consumption over 2.3km/h walking speed .

본 연구에서는 하퇴 절단환자에서 고정형. 단축형, 다축형 인공족관절 장착시 지면반발력과 에너지 소비량을 측정하여 하퇴의지에 대한 생체역학적 평가를 하였다. 실험에는 각각 2명의 남성과 여성 하퇴 절단 환자가 3종류의 의지를 착용하고 참여하였으며. 3차원 보행분석은 7개의 기준점에 대하여 전체 입각기에 대한 지면 반발력의 체중에 대한 비율로 나타내었다. 하퇴의지 에너지 소비량은 피 실험자들이 각각 2km/h, 3km/h 그리고 가장 걷기 편한 속도로 런닝머신 위에서 보행하게 하면서 측정하였다 실험결과는 지면반발력에서 다축형 인공족관절 장착시 추진력과 후진력의 보행특성에 대하여 우위를 보이며, 고정형 인공족관절 장착시에는 보행균형과 무게중심의 이동에 대해 상대적인 우위를 보였다. 에너지 소비량은 2.3km/h 이상의 보행속도에서 단축형 인공족관절 장착시 다른 두 의지에 비해 적은량의 에너지 소비를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. The human motor. EP. Dutton Amar J
  2. Res Quart Exer Sports v.55 Ground reaction force symmetry during walking and running Hamil J;bates BT;Knutzen KM
  3. J Rehabil Med Suppl v.12 Energy expenditure and cardiac response in above-knee amputees while using prostheses with open and locked knee mechanisms Isakov E;Susak Z;Becker E
  4. Scand J Rehabil Med v.27 Energy cost ambulation in transfemoral amputees;A knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control A.M. Boonstra, MD, PhD; J. Schrama, V. Fidler, PhD;W.H. Eisma, MD
  5. Arch Phys Med Rehabil v.73 Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Energy-Storing Prostheric Feet Michael R., MD, PhD;Margaret E. BcBride, MPE;David J. Sanderson. PhD;D. Duncan Murray, MD
  6. Prosthet Orthot Int v.21 Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet Part 1 : biomechanical analysis related to user benefits K. POSTEMA;H. J. HERMENS;J. DEVRIES;H. F. J. M. KOOPMAN;W. H. EISHA
  7. J Appl Physiol v.115 Metabolic cost of walking;equation and model Workman JM;Amstrong BW
  8. Scand J Rehabil Med v.5 Oxygen uptake and heart rate during proshetic walking in health male unilateral above-knee amputees James U
  9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil v.74 The relationship between comfortable and most metabolical afficient walking speed in persons with unilateral above-knee amputation Jaegers SMHJ;Vos LDW;Rispens P;Hof AL
  10. Arch Phys Med Rehabil v.78 Physiological comparison of walking among bilateral above-knee amputee and able-bodied subjects, and a model to account for the differences in metabolic cost Hoffman MD;Scheldahl LM;Buley KJ;Sandford PR
  11. Arch Phys Med Rehabil v.76 Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy storing foot and SACH foot in patients with traumatic below-knee vascular amputations Casillas J-M;Dulieu V;Cohen M;Marcer I;Didier J-P
  12. 대한의용생체공학회지 v.19 no.3 대퇴의 지별 지면반발력 및 에너지소모의 측정과 생체역학적 평가 김성민;박창일;최성오;신지철;김덕용;김남현