Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지

Optimum Life-cycle Cost Design of Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges

강상판교의 생애주기비용 최적설계

  • 조효남 (한양대학교 토목.환경공학과) ;
  • 민대홍 (한양대학교 토목.환경공학과) ;
  • 이광민 (한양대학교 토목.환경공학과)
  • Received : 2001.04.13
  • Published : 2001.08.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study present an optimum deck and girder system design for minimizing the life-cycle cost (LCC) of orthotropic steel deck bridges. The problem of optimum LCC design of orthotropic steel deck bridges is formulated as that of minimization of the expected total LCC that consists of initial cost, maintenance cost, expected retrofit costs for strength, deflection, and fatigue. To demonstrate the effect of LCC optimum design of orthotropic steel deck bridges, the proposed optimum LCC design is compared with the conventional method for orthotropic steel deck bridges design. From the numerical investigations, it may be positively stated that the proposed optimum design procedure for orthotropic steel deck bridges based on the LCC will lead to more rational, economical and safer design.

교량은 계속적으로 변하는 하중 환경에 의해서 다른 구조물에 비해 비교적 빨리 노후화 되기 때문에 초기비용 이외에도 교량의 유지관리, 교통의 원활한 소통 또는 적체 등에 따른 비용, 교량의 손상에 따른 보수보강 및 교량의 해체 재건설 등 추가적인 비용의 영향이 크므로 공용간 생애주기 비용(LCC)을 설계단계에서부터 체계적이고 합리적으로 고려되어야 한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 강상판교의 설계에 있어서 주형의 휨 전단, 사용성, 피로에 대한 보강기대비용 등을 포함하는 LCC에 근거한 비용함수모형을 이용하여 이를 최적설계에 적용하고 기존의 설계방법과 비교 분석하였다. 적용예제의 결과에 나타난 바와 같이 LCC를 고려한 강상판 교량의 최적설계는 더욱 합리적이고, 경제적이며, 안전한 설계를 유동할 수 있으리라 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 학술진흥재단

References

  1. Probalilistic Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Method:Application fir Structural Design and Matintenance S-N Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Highway Bridges Albrecht. P.
  2. John Wiley v.1 probability Concepts in Engneering Planning and Design Ang, A. H-S;Tang, W. H.
  3. Society of Industrial and Applied mathematics Compitational differentiation-techniques, tools, and appliations Bez. M;Bischof. C;Corliss, G.;Griewank, A.(ed.)
  4. Scientific Progranmming v.1 no.1 ADIFOR-generating derivative codes from FORTRAN 77 programs Bichof, C.;Carle, A.;Corliss, G.;Griewank, A.;Hovland, P.
  5. IEEE Computational Sci. and Engrg. v.3 no.3 The ADIFOR2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of FORTRAN 77 programs Bichof, C.;Carle, A.;Khademi, P.;Mauer, A.
  6. Preprint ANL/MCS-P626-1196 ADIC-an extensible automatic differentiation tool for ANSI-C Bischof, C.;Roh, L.;Mauer, A.
  7. Proc. instn Civ, Engrs Structs and Bldgs v.104 Bridge Management Policy using cost analysis de Brito J.;Branco, F. A.
  8. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign FORTRAN Genetic Algorithm and Astronautical Engineering Carroll, D. F.
  9. 5th International Conference in Structural Safety and Reliagility Reliability Assessment and of Reliagility-Based Rating of Existing Road Bridges Cho. H. N.;Ang, A. H. S.
  10. National Bureau of Standard SP0557 Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58 Ellingwood, B, R,;Galambos, T. V.;Mactrigor, J. C.;Cornell,C. A.
  11. J. Struct. Eng. v.123 no.10 Life-Cycle Cost Design Design of Deteriorating Structures Frangopol, D. M.;Lin, K. Y.
  12. Philadelphia, Pa Automatic differentiation pf algorithms : theory implementation and application. Society of Industrial and Application Mathematics Griewank, A.(ed.);Gorliss, G. F.(ed.)
  13. on Mathermatical Software v.22 no.2 ADOL-C: a package ofr the automatic differentiation pf algorithms written in C/C++ ACM Trans Griewank, A;Juedes, D.;Utke, J.
  14. Prentice-Hall Uncertainty Analysis, Loads, and Satetu in Structural Engineering Hart, G. C.
  15. J. Struct, Eng v.123 no.3 Reliability-Based Optimization of Plant Precast Cintrete Structures Koskito, O. J.;Ellignwood, B. R.
  16. Department of Civil Engineering Realiability-based minimum Life-Cycle Cost Design of Theses Lin, K. Y.
  17. Ellis Horwood Ltd. Structural Reliability, Analysis and Preduction melchers, R. E.
  18. The Korean Design Bfidge Dode(KBDC) v.45 no.4 Ministry of Construction and Traffic Roasting, N.;Dalmas, S.;Calligo, A.
  19. Strunt, Safety v.3 no.2 Optimum Reliabilities and Optimum Design Rosenblueth, E.
  20. Transporationa Research Board Comprehensive framwork for high economic impact assessment methods and result. Transportation Research Rech\ord 1274 Seskin, S. N.
  21. Computational application, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematices ADOL-F: Automatic differentiation of FORTRAN codes Shiriaev, D.;Grewank, A.
  22. Engineering Design Optimization, INc, ACS: A FORTRAN Program for Automated Design Synthesis Vanderplaats, Garret N.
  23. McGraw-Hill Numerical Optimazation Techniques for Engineering Design Vanderplaats, Garret N.
  24. 사단법인 도료교통협회 도료교설계기준
  25. 석사학위논문 강상판교의 최적 Life-Cycle Cost설계 이광민
  26. 대한토목학회 논문집 v.19 신뢰성에 기초한 강상형교의 단면 최적설계 조효남;이두화;정지승;민대홍
  27. 전산구조공학회 가을 학술발표회 논문집 강상자형교의 최적 Life-Cycle Cost설계 조효남;민대홍;김구선
  28. 강구조학회 논문집 v.11 no.5 효율적인 재해석 기법에 의한 강상자형교의 최적설계 조효남;정지승
  29. 전산구조공학회 가을 학술발표회 눈문집 고속철도 강교량의 Life-Cycle Cost 최적설계 조효남;민대홍;조준석