Roux Stasis Syndrome in Conventional Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy and Uncut Roux-en-Y Gastrojejunostomy after Subtotal Gastrectomy

위아전절제술 후 Roux-en-Y 위공장 재건술식과 Uncut Roux-en-Y 재건술식에서의 Roux Stasis Syndrome

  • Noh Seung-Moo (Departments of General Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Bae Jin-Sun (Departments of General Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Jeong Hyun-Yong (Departments of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Cho June-Sik (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Shin Kyung-Sook (Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Song Kyu-Sang (Departments of Pathology, Chungnam National University Hospital)
  • 노승무 (충남대학교병원 일반외과) ;
  • 배진선 (충남대학교병원 일반외과) ;
  • 정현용 (충남대학교병원 내과) ;
  • 조준식 (충남대학교병원 진단방사선과) ;
  • 신경숙 (충남대학교병원 진단방사선과) ;
  • 송규상 (충남대학교병원 병리과)
  • Published : 2001.03.01

Abstract

Purpose: Roux stasis syndrome is the main complication of a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence rate of Roux stasis syndrome with the passing of time in a conventional Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and in an uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Materials and Methods: 50 patients (31 men and 19 women) had a conventional Roux-en-Y reconstruction and 53 patients (35 men and 18 women) had an uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The Roux stasis syndrome was defined by clinical criteria only. The criteria included one of the four following conditions at the time of follow-up: chronic upper abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, persistent nausea, and intermittent vomiting that are worsened by eating. Follow-up after surgery was done in all patients at $7\∼12,\;13\~18,\;19\~24,\;25\~30$, and $31\∼36$ months. Results: According to the criteria, the Roux stasis syndrome occurred in 40.0$\%$ of the patients at 7$\∼$12 months, 33.3$\%$ at $13\∼19$ months, $35.3\%$ at $19\∼24$ months, $32.0\%$ at $25\~30$ months, and $33.3\%$ at $31\∼36$ months after a conventional Roux-en-Y operation. The syndrome occurred in $22.6\%$ of the patients at $7\∼12$ months, $15.2\%$ at $13\∼18$ months, $17.1\%$ at $19\∼24$ months, $19.2\%$ at $25\∼30$ months, and $20\%$ at $31\∼36$ months after an uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Conclusion: In terms of occurrence pattern, only a little variance existed one year after both procedures. Comparing the Roux stasis syndrome in both procedures, the uncut Roux operation had better results than the conventional Roux operation.

Keywords