LEAKAGE EVALUATION OF SEVERAL SEALERS USING ANAEROBIC BACTERIAL LEAKAGE MODEL

혐기성세균모델을 이용한 봉함제(Sealer)의 미세누출에 관한 연구

  • Bae, Yong-Kue (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Tae-Suk (Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Conservative Dentistry, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Yoon, Soo-Han (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 배용규 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 오태석 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성의료원 치과진료부 보존과) ;
  • 윤수한 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2000.06.05

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the sealing ability of three sealers(Sealapex, Pulp canal sealer, AH26) used with continuous wave method using an anaerobic bacterial leakage model. 53 extracted human teeth with straight and single canals were prepared with crown-down pressureless technique using .04, .06 taper Profile(Maillefer, Swiss). Master apical file was maintained as #35 K-file. All canals of the experimental teeth were obturated with continuous wave method using System B(Analytic technology, U.S.A.) The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 15 and two control groups of 4. Experimental group 1 was obturated with Sealapex and group 2 with Pulp canal sealer, and group 3 with AH26. A dual chamber anaerobic bacterial leakage model was assembled. Brain heart infusion with yeast extract, hemin, menadion, and the chromogenic indicator bromocresol purple was used as the culture broth for Fusobacterium nucleatum(VPI 10197), The specimens were incubated in anaerobic chamber at $37^{\circ}C$ and were observed every 2 to 3 clays, The coronal leakage was evaluated through the color change of culture broth in lower chamber for 60 days. The results were as follows: 1. The incidence of bacterial leakage in group 1 (Sealapex group was 80%, 53% in group 2 (Pulp canal sealer), 27% in group 3 (AH26). 2. There were statistically significant differences in leakage scores between group 1 and group 2, and between group 1 and group 3, respectively. (P<0.05) 3. There was no significantly difference in leakage score between group 2 and group 3. (P>0 05)

Keywords