DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Objectively Predicting Ultimate Quality of Post-Rigor Pork Musculature: I. Initial Comparison of Techniques

  • Joo, S.T. (Division of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kauffman, R.G. (Muscle Biology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison) ;
  • Warner, R.D. (Meat Research and Training Centre, Dept. of Agriculture) ;
  • Borggaard, C. (Danish Meat Research Institute) ;
  • Stevenson-Barry, J.M. (Muscle Biology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison) ;
  • Lee, S. (Department of Animal Science, Korea University) ;
  • Park, G.B. (Division of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, B.C. (Department of Animal Science, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 1999.01.25
  • 심사 : 1999.04.29
  • 발행 : 2000.01.01

초록

A total of 290 pork loins were selected to include a wide variation of quality to investigate the quality categories into which most pork falls, selection criteria for these categories and methods to objectively assess ultimate pork quality. They were probed at 24 h postmortem (PM) for the following: A) light reflectance by Danish Meat Quality Marbling (MQM), Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP) and Sensoptic Invasive Probe (SIP); B) electrical properties by NWK LT-K21 conductivity (NLT) and Sensoptic Resistance Probe (SRP): and C) pH by NWK pH-K21 (NpH). Also, measurements of % drip loss (PDL) and filter paper wetness (FPW), color brightness (L*), ultimate pH (pHu), lipid content, subjective color (SC), firmness/wetness (SF) and marbling scores (SM) were assessed. Each loin was categorized as either pale, soft and exudative (PSE), reddish-pink, soft and exudative (RSE), reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative (RFN) or dark, firm and dry (DFD). Statistically comparing coefficients of determination (CD), the results indicated that overall, the HGP predicted quality groups slightly better than MQM (CD=71 and 62% respectively), NpH and SRP were less effective (CD= 56 and 44% respectively), and SIP and NLT had the lowest values (CD=36 and 5% respectively). Combining various independent variable did not greatly improve the variation accounted for. When the data was sorted into marbling groups based on lipid content, this was not accurately predicted by any of the probe measurements. The MQM probe remained the best predictor for marbling class and accounted for about 25% of the lipid content variation. This was slightly improved to 33% when pHu was combined with MQM.

키워드

피인용 문헌

  1. Relationship Between the Subjective and Objective Assessment of Pork M. semimembranosus and Classification of Further Processed Pork Quality vol.11, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013205052621
  2. A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF DIETARY CONJUGATED LINOLEIC ACID CONTENTS, CHOLESTEROL, LIPID OXIDATION AND DRIP LOSS IN PORK LOIN AND CHICKEN BREAST vol.18, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2007.00082.x
  3. Chemical Components and Meat Quality Traits Related to Palatability of Ten Primal Cuts from Hanwoo Carcasses vol.35, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.859
  4. The Relationship between Chemical Compositions, Meat Quality, and Palatability of the 10 Primal Cuts from Hanwoo Steer vol.36, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.2.145
  5. Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork vol.46, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160013
  6. The influence of diets supplemented with conjugated linoleic acid, selenium, and vitamin E, with or without animal protein, on the quality of pork from female pigs1 vol.86, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0437
  7. Conjugated linoleic acid differentially regulates fat deposition in backfat and longissimus muscle of finishing pigs1 vol.88, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1551
  8. Influence of a rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid mixture on carcass traits and meat quality in young simmental heifers1 vol.90, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3617
  9. Classification of pork quality by hierarchical cluster analysis vol.120, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2017-0589
  10. Evaluation of Three Pork Quality Prediction Tools Across a 48 Hours Postmortem Period vol.19, pp.2, 2000, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.266