Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
- Volume 30 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.133-146
- /
- 2000
- /
- 2093-2278(pISSN)
- /
- 2093-2286(eISSN)
Clinical Study of Tetracycline HCl Conditioning in the Treatment of Gingival Recession. A Comparative Study
치근 피개 술식시 치근에 도포된 테트라사이클린의 효과에 관한 임상적 연구
- Kim, Jong-Ae (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-kook National University) ;
- Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-kook National University) ;
- Lim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-kook National University)
- Published : 2000.03.30
Abstract
Histological studies indicate a tetracycline HCl similar to citric acid to induce connetive tissue repair in animals. When tetracycline HCl was used as a root conditioning agent in humans, there was a trend toward more connective tissue attachment than in root planing alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical effect of tetracycline HCl in the treatment of gingival recession. 44 teeth in 12 patients with bilaterally gingival recession & Miller classification I, II gingival recession were selected and 22 teeth were treated with 125mg/ml tetracycline HCl , the others was not treated with tetracycline HCl. Gingival recession, pocket depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized gingiva were observed at baseline, postoperative 4, 12, 20weeks. Both groups were statistically analyzed by Wilcoxon signed Ranks Test & Wilcoxon's rank sum test(Mann-whitney test) using SPSS program.(5% significance level) The results were as follows: 1........The change of gingival recession, clinical attachment level, keratinized gingiva in both groups were increased significantly at 4, 12, 20 weeks. 2.......The pocket depth exhibited no marked changes throughout the entire investigation in both groups. 3........The change of gingival recession in tetracycline group was increased significantly than control group at 4, 12, 20 weeks and the percentage of root coverage was 93% in tetracycline group and 83% in control group. 4........The change of clinical attachment level, pocket depth, keratinized tissue from baseline to 4, 12, 20 weeks was not differ significanltly in both group.
Keywords