철강용접자의 크롬 및 망간 노출평가와 산업위생관리 대책에 관한 연구

Evaluation of Chromium and Manganese Exposure in Welders and Establishment of Efficient Preventive Measures for Fume Exposure

  • 이영세 (포항종합제철 보건관리팀) ;
  • 윤종국 (계명대학교 공중보건학과) ;
  • 박종안 (순천향대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 이송권 (포항종합제철 보건관리팀) ;
  • 채종홍 (포항종합제철 보건관리팀) ;
  • 김억수 (포항종합제철 보건관리팀)
  • Lee, Young-Sei (Health Care Center.Pohang Iron and Steel Company) ;
  • Yoon, Chong-Guk (Department of Public Health Keimyung University) ;
  • Park, Jong-An (Department of Environmental Health Science Soonchanhyang University) ;
  • Lee, Song-Kwon (Health Care Center.Pohang Iron and Steel Company) ;
  • Chae, Jong-Hong (Health Care Center.Pohang Iron and Steel Company) ;
  • Kim, Ek-Soo (Health Care Center.Pohang Iron and Steel Company)
  • 투고 : 1999.09.02
  • 심사 : 1999.12.09
  • 발행 : 2000.05.10

초록

Results of environmental monitoring for 35 steel industry welders exposed to manganese and chromium fume were evaluated. Efficiency of respiratory protectors, welding face shields and local exhaust ventilation were also evaluated to establish more efficient preventive measures that can protect welders from occupational disease as related to welding fume. The results are as follows; 1. Total fume from $CO_2$ arc welding with mild steel occurred 1.5 to 2.2 times more than that from shielded metal arc welding. Chromium and nickel fume from welding with stainless steel occurred 27 to 59 times and 18 to 30 times, respectively, than those with mild steel. 2. Proportions of water-soluble chromium(VI) and insoluble chromium(VI) Compare to total chromium occurring from $CO_2$ arc welding with stainless steel were 10.5% and 8.7%, respectively, while those with mild steel were 57.1 to 63.2% and 31.6 to 38.1%, respectively. 3. The efficiencies of 4 types of respiratory protectors to reduce welding fume exposure were evaluated as 54.4 to 64.4%. 4. The reducing effect of head type welding face shield was 67.6%, and that of hand type welding face shield was 58.5%. The highest reducing effect was shown in air supply welding face shield as 99.2%, although it is not convenient to wear. 5. When welding face shield and respiratory protectors were worn together, the reducing efficiency increased to 79.0 to 87.5%. 6. When local exhaust ventilation was installed in workplace, the reducing efficiencies varied from 31.5 to 73.1% according to the types of welding.

키워드