Hepatic Hemangiomas: Spectrum of US Appearances on Gray-scale, Power Doppler, and Contrast-Enhanced US

  • Kyoung Won Kim (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Tae Kyoung Kim (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Joon Koo Han (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Ah Young Kim (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Hyun Ju Lee (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Seong Ho Park (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Young Hoon Kim (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Byung Ihn Choi (Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2000.06.06
  • Accepted : 2000.08.06
  • Published : 2000.12.31

Abstract

Because US plays a key role in the initial evaluation of hepatic hemangiomas, knowledge of the entire spectrum of US appearances of these tumors is important. Most hemangiomas have a distinctive US appearance, and even with those with atypical appearances on conventional gray-scale US, specific diagnoses can be made using pulse-inversion harmonic US with contrast agents. In this essay, we review the spectrum of US appearances of hepatic hemangiomas on conventional gray-scale, power Doppler, and pulse-inversion harmonic US with contrast agents.

Keywords

References

  1. Mirk P, Rubaltelli L, Bazzocchi M, et al. Ultrasonographic patterns in hepatic hemangiomas. J Clin Ultrasound 1982;10:373-378 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870100805
  2. Taboury J, Porcel A, Tubiana JM, Monnier JP. Cavernous hemangiomas of the liver studied by ultrasound: enhancement posterior to a hyperechoic mass as a sign of hypervascularity. Radiology 1983;149:781-785 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.149.3.6647856
  3. Friedman AC, Frazier S, Hendrix TM, Ros PR. Focal disease. In Friedman AC, Dachman AH, eds. Radiology of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas. St. Louis: Mosby 1994:169-327
  4. Gibney RG, Hendin AP, Cooperberg PL. Sonographically detected hepatic hemangiomas: absence of change over time. AJR 1987;149:953-957 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.5.953
  5. Moody AR, Wilson SR. Atypical hepatic hemangioma: a suggestive sonographic morphology. Radiology 1993;188:413-417 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327687
  6. Marsh JI, Gibney RG, Li DKB. Hepatic hemangioma in the presence of fatty infiltration: an atypical sonographic appearance. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:262-264 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889211
  7. Chang J, Han K. Relation of internal echo patterns and hemodynamics by incremental dynamic CT in hepatic cavernous hemangioma. J Korean Radiol Soc 1993;29:775-782 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1993.29.4.775
  8. Yu JS, Kim MJ, Kim KW, et al. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: sonographic patterns and speed of contrast enhancement on multiphase dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1998;171:1021-1025 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762989
  9. Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, Hong HS, Park SH, Moon SK. Hepatic tumors: contrast agent enhancement patterns with pulse-inversion harmonic US. Radiology 2000;216:411-417 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00jl21411
  10. Choi BI, Kim TK, Han JK, Chung JW, Park JH, Han MC. Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of vasculature in liver tumors. Radiology 1996;200:55-58 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657945
  11. Young LK, Yang WT, Chan KW, Metreweli C. Hepatic hemangiomas: quantitative color power US angiography-facts and fallacies. Radiology 1998;207:51-57 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530298
  12. Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Park SJ, Choi BI. Signal from hepatic hemangiomas on power Doppler US: real or artefactual? Ultrasound in Med and Biol 1999;25:1055-1061 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00058-7
  13. Lopez-Ben R, Robbin ML, Weber TM, Smith JK, Needleman L, Berland LL. Doppler sonographic enhancement of hepatic hemangiomas and hepatocellular carcinomas after perflenapent emulsion: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:109-116 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1999.18.2.109
  14. Kim AY, Choi BI, Kim TK, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: power Doppler US with a contrast agent-preliminary results. Radiology 1998;209:135-140 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769824
  15. Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Choi BI. Limitations of characterization of hepatic hemangiomas using a sonographic contrast agent (Levovist) and power Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:737-743 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1999.18.11.737