Hepatic Cavernous Hemangioma in Cirrhotic Liver: Imaging Findings

  • Jeong-Sik Yu (Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ki Whang Kim (Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Mi-Suk Park (Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sang-Wook Yoon (Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2000.07.19
  • 심사 : 2000.10.04
  • 발행 : 2000.12.31

초록

Objective: To document the imaging findings of hepatic cavernous hemangioma detected in cirrhotic liver. Materials and Methods: The imaging findings of 14 hepatic cavernous hemangiomas in ten patients with liver cirrhosis were retrospectively analyzed. A diagnosis of hepatic cavernous hemangioma was based on the findings of two or more of the following imaging studies: MR, including contrast-enhanced dynamic imaging (n = 10), dynamic CT (n = 4), hepatic arteriography (n = 9), and US (n = 10). Results: The mean size of the 14 hepatic hemangiomas was 0.9 (range, 0.5-1.5) cm in the longest dimension. In 11 of these (79%), contrast-enhanced dynamic CT and MR imaging showed rapid contrast enhancement of the entire lesion during the early phase, and hepatic arteriography revealed globular enhancement and rapid filling-in. On contrast-enhanced MR images, three lesions (21%) showed partial enhancement until the 5-min delayed phases. US indicated that while three slowly enhancing lesions were homogeneously hyperechoic, 9 (82%) of 11 showing rapid enhancement were not delineated. Conclusion: The majority of hepatic cavernous hemangiomas detected in cirrhotic liver are small in size, and in many, hepatic arteriography and/or contrast-enhanced dynamic CT and MR imaging demonstrates rapid enhancement. US, however, fails to distinguish a lesion of this kind from its cirrhotic background.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Itai Y, Ohnishi S, Ohtomo K, Kokubo T, Imawari M, Atomi Y. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma in patients at high risk for liver cancer. Acta Radiol 1987;28:697-701
  2. Hanafusa K, Ohashi I, Himeno Y, Suzuki S, Shibuya H. Hepatic hemangioma: findings with two-phase CT. Radiology 1995;196:465-469
  3. Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Shima Y, et al. Atypical radiographic findings in hepatic cavernous hemangioma: correlation with histologic features. AJR 1986;146:1149-1153
  4. Moody AR, Wilson SR. Atypical hepatic hemangioma: a suggestive sonographic morphology. Radiology 1993;188:413-417
  5. Freeny PC, Vimont TR, Barnett DC. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: ultrasonography, arteriography, and computed tomography. Radiology 1979;132:143-148
  6. Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW, Jo BJ, Kim JK. Early homogeneously enhancing hemangioma versus hepatocellular carcinoma : differentiation using quantitative analysis of multiphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Yonsei Med J 1999;40:248-255
  7. Bree RL, Schwab RE, Neiman HL. Solitary echogenic spot in the liver: is it diagnostic of a hemangioma? AJR 1983;140:41-45
  8. Gandolfi L, Leo P, Solmi L, Vitelli E, Verros G, Colecchia A. Natural history of hepatic hemangiomas: clinical and ultrasound study. Gut 1991;32:677-680
  9. Gibney RG, Hendin AP, Cooperberg PL. Sonographically detected hepatic hemangiomas: absence of change over time. AJR 1987;149:953-957
  10. De Caralt TM, Ayuso JR, Ayuso C, Schorlemmer WC. Distortion of subcapsular hepatic hemangioma by hepatic cirrhosis. Can Assoc Radiol 1999;50:137-138
  11. Kobayashi T, Kawano M, Tomita Y, et al. Follow-up study of hepatic hemangiomas. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1995;92:41-46 [in Japanese]
  12. Yu JS, Kim MJ, Kim KW, et al. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: sonographic patterns and speed of contrast enhancement on multiphase dynamic MR imaging. AJR 1998;171:1021-1025
  13. Jeong MG, Yu JS, Kim KW. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: temporal peritumoral enhancement during multiphase dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 2000;216:692-697
  14. Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Urata J, Takahashi M. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with dynamic CT findings. Radiology 1997;203:121-125
  15. Yu JS, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Intratumoral blood-flow in cavernous hemangioma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1998;208:549-550
  16. March JI, Gibney RG, Li DK. Hepatic hemangioma in the presence of fatty infiltration: an atypical sonographic appearance. Gastrointest Radiol 1989;14:262-264
  17. Choji K, Shinohara M, Nojima T, et al. Significant reduction of the echogenicity of the compressed cavernous hemangioma. Acta Radiol 1988;29:317-320
  18. Nelson RC, Chezmar JL. Diagnostic approach to hepatic hemangiomas. Radiology 1990;176:11-13