Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제1권3호
  • /
  • Pages.142-151
  • /
  • 2000
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지

The Optimization of Scan Timing for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography

  • Jongmin J. Lee (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Phillip J. Tirman (San Francisco Magnetic Resonance Center) ;
  • Yongmin Chang (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hun-Kyu Ryeom (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Sang-Kwon Lee (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yong-Sun Kim (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Duk-Sik Kang (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2000.01.03
  • 심사 : 2000.07.04
  • 발행 : 2000.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To determine the optimal scan timing for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and to evaluate a new timing method based on the arteriovenous circulation time. Materials and Methods: Eighty-nine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiographic examinations were performed mainly in the extremities. A 1.5T scanner with a 3-D turbo-FLASH sequence was used, and during each study, two consecutive arterial phases and one venous phase were acquired. Scan delay time was calculated from the time-intensity curve by the traditional (n = 48) and/or the new (n = 41) method. This latter was based on arteriovenous circulation time rather than peak arterial enhancement time, as used in the traditional method. The numbers of first-phase images showing a properly enhanced arterial phase were compared between the two methods. Results: Mean scan delay time was 5.4 sec longer with the new method than with the traditional. Properly enhanced first-phase images were found in 65% of cases (31/48) using the traditional timing method, and 95% (39/41) using the new method. When cases in which there was mismatch between the target vessel and the time-intensity curve acquisition site are excluded, erroneous acquisition occurred in seven cases with the traditional method, but in none with the new method. Conclusion: The calculation of scan delay time on the basis of arteriovenous circulation time provides better timing for arterial phase acquisition than the traditional method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Winreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996;201:705-710 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939219
  2. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-164 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134563
  3. Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, et al. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AJR 1991; 157:981-990 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.157.5.1927823
  4. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480757
  5. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR 1996;166:971-981 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610584
  6. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath-hold. Radiology 1996;198:725-732 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628861
  7. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;201:569-571 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.2.8888260
  8. Lin W, Haacke EM, Smith AS, Clampitt ME. Gadolinium-enhanced high-resolution MR angiography with adaptive vessel tracking: preliminary results in the intracranial circulation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:277-284 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880020305
  9. Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L, et al. Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1990;175:443-448 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.175.2.2326471
  10. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880030614
  11. Pavone P, Giuliani S, Cardone G, et al. Intraarterial portography with gadopentetate dimeglumine: improved liver-to-lesion contrast in MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179:693-697 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027976
  12. Losef SV, Rajan SS, Patt RH, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnitude contrast MR angiography of popliteal and tibial arteries. Radiology 1992;184:349-355 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.184.2.1620827
  13. Adamis MK, Li W, Wielopolski PA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-offlight sequence. Radiology 1995;196:689-695 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.196.3.7644630
  14. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Mueller D, Fischer U, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Results of a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold after optimization of the contrast material bolus. Fortschr Rontgenstr 1997;166:15-20
  15. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494486
  16. Foo TK, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;203:275-280 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122407
  17. Kopka L, Vosshenrich R, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. AJR 1998;170:345-348 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.2.9456943
  18. Willems JL, Roelandt JR, Van de Vel HR, Joossens JV. The circulation time in the elderly. Am J Cardiol 1971;27:155-161 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(71)90252-9
  19. Pierson RN, Grieco M, Swinton N, Dubin M. Circulation time end points: a quantitative comparison of saccharin and radioiodinated albumin as indicators. Circulation 1966;34:997-1004 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.34.6.997
  20. Selzer A, Dunlap RW, Wray HW, Russell J. A critical appraisal of the circulation time test. Arch Intern Med 1968;122:491-495. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1968.00300100025006
  21. Becker GJ, Holden RW. Sodium dehydrocholate circulation times in digital subtraction angiography. AJR 1983;140:817-818 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.140.4.817
  22. Lauzon ML, Holdsworth DW, Frayne R, Rutt BK. Effects of physiologic waveform variability in triggered MR imaging: theoretical analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:853-867 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880040618
  23. Mezrich R. Perspective on k space (tutorial). Radiology 1995;195:297-315 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724743
  24. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-651 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880060413