Content Analysis of Food & Nutrition Section in Middle School Textbooks -Home Economics, Physical Education and Science-

중학교 교과서 식생활 내용분석 -가정, 체육, 과학을 중심으로-

  • Published : 2000.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was quantitative and qualitative contents analysis of food and nutrition section in middle school textbooks of home economics, physical education and science. As a quantitative approach numbers of sentence lines tables, figures, photos, activities, and exercises were counted. As a qualitative approach, types of explanations were categorized by 7 criteria, and commons and differences of the contents of those subjects were compared. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: 1) Contents of food and nutrition section were divided into nutrients. water. energy, food groups, and nutritional problems. When average sentence lines of each were compared, those of nutrients were the longest in all 3 subjects. 2) When compared the numbers of tables, figures, and photos in 3 subjects of textbooks, there were more figures in home economics and science, and more tables in physical education. 3) There were more activities and exercises in home economics an science than in physical education. 4) The D(sentences with table) or E type(sentences with figure) was adapted for the explanation of nutrients functions, recommended dietary allowance, food sources, food groups, eating habits, and weight control in home economics: nutritions functions and energy metabolism in physical education : and digestion, body constituents, energy metabolism, and detection of nutrients in science. 5) Contents about classification and functions of nutrients. food sources deficiency water, energy contents of nutrients and obesity were shown in all 3 subjects. Food groups and eating habits were explained in detail in home economics whereas digestion of nutrients in the digestive tracts were explained in detail in science. Recommended dietary allowance for Koreans and basic food groups revised in 1995 were presented in home economics, whereas those revised in 1989 were presented in physical education. To avoid confusion, recommended dietary allowance for Koreans and food groups presented in physical education tex should be updated.

Keywords

References

  1. 중학교 가정 교과서 선정 기준에 대한 연구 권리라
  2. 한국실과교육학회지 v.10 no.1 초·중등 교과서 분석 연구 김혜자(외 2인)
  3. 중학교 8종 가정과 교과서 비교분석;제 5, 6차 교육과정기 교과서를 중심으로 박정원
  4. 가정 1학년 교사용 지도서 성화경(외 5인)
  5. 한국가정과교육학회지 v.8 no.1 중학교 가정 교과서 분석 연구(Ⅰ) 윤인경
  6. 한국가정과교육학회지 v.8 no.2 중학교 가정 교과서 분석 연구(Ⅱ) 윤인경
  7. 한국가정과교육학회지 v.9 no.1 중학교 가정 교과서 분석 연구(Ⅲ) 윤인경
  8. 중학교 기술교과와 과학교과와의 공통성 비교 연구;중학교 1, 2학년 교과를 중심으로 고찰 이종국
  9. 초등학교 실과 교과의 내용 및 수준 적정화를 위한 분석적 연구 정선순
  10. 고등학교 과학Ⅰ(상)과 가정교과의 중복 내용 조사생물과 영양과 식생활단원을 중심으로 정인옥
  11. 한국가정과교육학회지 v.10 no.1 중학교 가정교과와 다른 교과의 교육내용 관련성 분석 정정희