Automated Mold Design to Optimize Multi-Quality Characteristics in Injection Molded Parts Based on the Utility Theory and Modified Complex Method

효용이론과 수정콤플렉스법에 기초한 사출 성형품의 다특성 최적화를 위한 자동 금형 설계

  • Park, Byung-H (Dept.of Machanical Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 박종천 (금오공과대학교 기계공학부)
  • Published : 2000.09.01

Abstract

Plastic mold designers and frequently faced with optimizing multi-quality issues in injection molded parts. These issues are usually in conflict with each other and thus tradeoff needs to be made to reach a final compromised solution. in this study an automated injection molding design methodology has been developed to optimize multi-quality characteristics of injection molded parts. The features of the proposed methodology are as follows : first utility theory is applied to transform the original multi-objective problem into single-objective problem. Second is an implementation of a direct search-based injection molding optimization procedure with automated consideration of robustness against process variation. The modified complex method is used as a general optimization tool in this study. The developed methodology was applied to an actual mold design and the results showed that the methodology was useful through the CAE simulation using a commercial injection molding software package. Applied to production this study will be of immense value to companies in reducing the product development time and enhancing the product quality.

Keywords

References

  1. E.C. Bernhardt, CAE-Computer Aided Engineering for Injection Molding, Hanser Publishers, New York, pp. 275-324, 1983
  2. D. Yao, Direct Search-Based Automatic Minimization of Warpage and Weldlines in Injection Molded Parts, Masters Thesis, University of Massachusetts, MA., pp. 40-43, pp. 80-88, 1998
  3. W.Y. Fowlkes and C.M. Creveling, Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York, pp. 53-62, pp. 312-325, 1995
  4. S.R. Schmidt and R.G. Launsby. Understanding Industrial Designed Experiments, Air Academy Press&Associates, Colorado, pp. 4-1-4-20, pp. 5-18-5-21, pp. 5-65-5-71, 1997
  5. B.H. Lee and B.H. Kim, 'Automated Selection of Gate Location Based On Desired Quality of Injection-Molded Part,' Polym.-Plast. Tech. Eng., Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 253 -269, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559608000583
  6. M.S. Jacques, 'An Analysis of Thermal Warpage in Injection Molded Flat parts Due to Unbalanced Cooling,' Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 241-247, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760220405
  7. M. Rezart and R.O. Stafford, 'A Thermoviscoelastic Model for Residual Stress in Injection Molded Plastics,' Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 393 -398, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760310602
  8. I. Pandelidis and Q. Zou, 'Optimization of Injection Molding Design, Partll: Molding Condition Optimization,' Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 30, No. 15, pp. 883 -892, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760301503
  9. 김석주, 유전 알고리즘을 이용한 사출 성형 조건의 최적화, 석사학위논문, 서울대학교, pp. 1-59, 1995
  10. 김영일, 유전 알고리즘을 이용한 사출 성형 설계의 자동화, 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, pp. 1-135, 1995
  11. G.H. Choi, K.D. Lee, N. Chan and S.K Kim, 1994, 'Optimization of Process Parameters of Injection Molding with Neural Network, Application in a Process Simulation Environment,' CIRP Annals, Vol. 43, pp. 449-452
  12. S.H. Dillman, D. Howe and H. Robar, 'Optimization of the Injection Molding Process,' SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers, Vol. 1, pp. 754-757, 1996
  13. B.H. Lee and B.H. Kim, 'Variation of Part Wall Thicknesses to Reduce Warpage of Injection Molded Part-Robust Design Against Process Variability,' Polym.-Plast. Tech. Eng., Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 791-807, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559708000661
  14. B.H. Lee and B.H. Kim, 'Optimization of Part Wall Thickness to Reduce Part Warpage Based on the Modified Complex Method,' Polym.-Plast. Tech. Eng., Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 793-811, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559508009600
  15. S. Gold and S. Krishnamurty, 'Trade-offs in Robust Engineering Design,' Proceedings of ASME-DETC'97, Sacramento, CA, pp. 1-8, 1997
  16. A. Kunjur and S. Krishnamurty, 'A Robust Multi-Criteria Optimization Approach,' Mech. Mach. Theory, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 797-810, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(97)00007-4
  17. R.L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 131-218, 1993
  18. D.L. Thurston, J.V. Carnahan, and T. Liu, 'Optimization of Design Utility,' J. Mech. Design, Vol. 116, pp. 801-808, 1994
  19. J. Wan and S. Krishnamurty, 'Towards a Consistent Preference Representation in Engineering Design,' Proceedings of ASME-DETC'98, Atlanta, GA, pp.1-10, 1998
  20. T.L. Satty, 'How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process,' European J. Operational Res., Vol. 48, pp. 9-26, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  21. G. Farin, Curves and Surfaces for Computer Aided Geometric Design-A Practical Guide, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp. 41-62, 1993
  22. G.V. Reklatis, A. Ravindran, and K.M. Ragsdell, Engineering Optimization Methods and Applications, John Wiley&Sons Inc., New York, pp. 268-277, 1983
  23. Advanced CAE Technology, C-MOLD Reference Manual, 1993