Water Engineering Research

한국수자원학회 (Korea Water Resources Association)
권호 표지

CAUTION OF REGIONAL FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS BASED ON WEIBULL MODEL

  • Heo, Jun-Haeng (Department of Civil Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Jin (Department of Civil Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Duk (Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Cooperation)
  • 발행 : 2000.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Regional flood frequency analysis has been developed by employing the nearby site's information to improve a precision in estimating flood quantiles at the site of interest. In this paper, single site and regional flood frequency analyses were compared based of the 2-parameter Weibull model. For regional analysis, two approaches were employed. The First one is to use the asymptotic variances of the quantile estimators derived based of the assumption that all sites including the site of interest are independent each other. This approach may give the maximum regional gain due to the spatial independence assumption among sites. The second one in Hosking's regional L-moment algorithm. These methods were applied to annual flood data. As the results, both methods generally showed the regional gain at the site of interest depending on grouping the sites as homogeneous. And asymptotic formula generally shows smaller variance than those from Hosking's algorithm. If the shape parameter of the site of interest from single site analysis is quite different from that from regional analysis then Hosking's results might be better than the asymptotic ones because the formula was derived based on the assumption that all sites have the same regional shape parameter. Furthermore, in such a case, regional analysis might be worse than single site analysis in the sense of precision of flood quantile estimation. Even though the selected sites may satisfy Hosking's criteria, regional analysis may not give a regional gain for specific and nonexceedance probabilities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Benson, M.A. (1962). Evolution of methods for evaluating the occurrence of floods. U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1580A
  2. Bobee, B., Cavadias, G., Ashkar, F., Bernier, J., Rasmussen, P. (1993). 'Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis,' Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 142, No. 5, pp. 121-136 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90008-W
  3. Boes, D.C., Heo, J.H., Salas, J.D., (1989). 'Regional flood quantile estimation for a Weibull model.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 979-970
  4. Cunnane, C. (1989). Statistical distributions for flood frequency analysis. WMO Operational Hydrological Report No. 33
  5. Curtis, G.W. (1987). Technique for estimating flood-peak discharges and frequencies on rural streams in basins in Illinois, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 87-991
  6. Darymple, T. (1960). 'Flood-frequency analyses.' U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1543A
  7. Filliben, J.J. (1975). 'The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality.' Technometrics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 111-117 https://doi.org/10.2307/1268008
  8. Greis, N.P. (1983). 'Flood frequency analysis: A review of 1979-1982.' Review of Geophysics and Space Physics, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 699-705
  9. Gries, N.P. and Wood, E.F. (1981). 'Regional flood-frequency estimation and network design.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 1167-1177
  10. Heo, J.H., Boes, D.C. and Salas, J.D. (1980) Regional flood-frequency modeling and estimation. No. 101, Water Resources Paper, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
  11. Hosking, J.R.M. (1990) 'L-moments : Analysis and estimation of distribution using linear combinations of order statistics.' Journal of Statistical Society Series B, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 105-124
  12. Hosking, J.R.M. (1996). Fortran routines for use with the method of L-moments, version 3, IBM Research Report RC 20525, IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, N. Y.
  13. Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R. (1988). 'The effect of intersite dependence on regional frequency analysis,' Water Resources Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 588-600
  14. Hosking, J.R. M. andWallis, J.R. (1993). 'Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis.' Water Resources Research ,Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 271-281 https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01980
  15. Hosking, J.R.M. and Wallis, J.R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis: An approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press
  16. Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R. and Wood, E.F. (1985). 'An appraisal of the regional flood frequency procedure in the UK flood studies report,' Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 85-109
  17. Lettenmaier, D.P. and Potter, K.W. (1985). 'Testing flood frequency estimation methods using a regional flood generation model.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 1903-1914
  18. Parida, B.P., Kachiroo, R.K., and Shrestha, D.B. (1998). 'Regional flood frequency analysis of Mahi-Sabarmati basin (Subzone 3-a) using index flood procedure with L-moments.' Water Resources Management, Vol. 1, No. 12, pp. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007970800408
  19. Rao, A.R. and Hamed, K.H. (1997). 'Regional frequency analysis of Wabash river flood data by L-moments.' Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 169-179 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:4(169)
  20. Rossi, F., Fiorentino, M., and Versace, P. (1984). 'Two-component extreme value distribution for flood frequency analysis,' Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 847-856
  21. Salas, J.D., Delleur, J.W., Yevjevich, V., and Lane, W.L. (1980). Applied modeling of hydrologic time series. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado
  22. Stedinger, J.R. and Tasker, G.D. (1985). 'Regional hydrological analysis 1. Ordinary, weighted and generalized least squares compared.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp. 1421-1432
  23. Stedinger, J.R. (1983). 'Estimating a regional flood frequency distribution.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 435-444
  24. Vogel, R.M. and Kroll, C.N. (1989). 'Low-flow frequency analysis using probability plot correlation coefficients.' Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 3. pp. 338-357
  25. Vogel, R.M. and Fennessay, N.M. (1993). 'L-moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1745-1752 https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00341
  26. Wallis, J.R. (1980). 'Risk and uncertainties in the evaluation of flood events for the design of hydraulic structures.' Seminar on Extreme Hydrological Events Floods and Droughts, Centro di Cult. Sci. E. Majorana, Erice, Italy