SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN TARGIS AND HUMAN DENTIN BY USING VARIOUS LUTING CEMEMTS

수종의 접착제를 이용한 Targis와 상아질간의 전단결합강도

  • Lee, Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University and Institute of Oral Bioscience) ;
  • Yu, Mi-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University and Institute of Oral Bioscience) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University and Institute of Oral Bioscience) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University and Institute of Oral Bioscience)
  • 이정 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 유미경 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이강원 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 1999.09.05

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate shear bond strength according to difference in luting cements and Targis surface treatment. 70 non-carious extracted human molars and Targis shade D210(Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) were used in the present study and they were randomly assigned into 7 experimental groups ; Group 1 : specimens were bonded with using vitremer(3M, U.S.A). Group 2, 4, 6 : specimens were not-treated with silane and bonded with Panavia 21(Kuraray Japan), Choice(Bisco, U.S.A.) and Variolink II(Vivadent, Liechtenstein) respectively Group 3, 5, 7 : specimens were treated with silane and bonded with Panavia 21, Choice and Variolink II respectively. After the surface treatment, the luting cement was mixed by manufacturer's recommendation and then applied between dentin and Targis and excess cement was removed by brush. All specimens were stored for 24 hrs in distiled water at $37^{\circ}C$. Shear bond strength for each group was then measured. To examine the failure patterns of targis to dentin, specimens were fabricated and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The mean shear bond strength of the groups using resin cements was significantly higher than that using resin-modified GI cements (P<0.05). 2. There is no significant difference in shear bond strength between Panavia 21 and Choice whether silane was used or not(P>0.05). However, bond strength for the groups using Variolink II was higher in the specimens not-treated with silane than the treated specimens (P<0.05). 3. There is no significant difference in bond strength among the groups using silane surface treatment and resin cement (group 3, 5, 7) (P<0.05). 4. The proportions of the specimens showing the mixed fracture failure were 20% in groups using Panavia 21 and Variolink II and 15% in group using Choice.

Keywords