A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF TWO DIFFERENT THREADED CP TITANIUM IMPLANTS

국내 제작 Avana 임프란트와 $Br{\aa}nemark$ 임프란트 주위 골조직에 대한 광학 및 형광 현미경학적 연구

  • Han, Dong-Hoo (Department of Prosthodontics College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Sik (Department of Prosthodontics College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jin (Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Seon-Jae (Department of Prosthodontics College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 한동후 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 전영식 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김진 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강병리학교실) ;
  • 김선재 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 1999.08.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare surface roughness and bone formation around two types of threaded commercially pure titanium implants manufactured by two different companies. The test implants were manufactured by Sumin synthesis dental materials Co. (Avana, Busan, Korea), while the controls were manufactured by Nobel Biocare (MK II, Goteborg, Sweden). To compare bone formation adjacent to newly product implant with $Br{\aa}nemark$ MK II implant, surface roughness was measured by Accurate 1500M and histomorphometric analysis was done. The results were as follows: 1. Measurement of surface roughness showed that Avana implant had a slightly more irregular surface compared with $Br{\aa}nemark$ implant. 2. In the light microscopic studies, no infiltration of inflammatory cells nor the giant cells were observed on both groups. 3. In the light and fluorescent microscopic studies, the amount of osseointegration and the extent and the timing of bone formation were similar. 4. There were no statistically difference between two groups in the average bone to implant con-tacts. Branemark implant; 67% (SD 23%), Avana implant; 70% (SD 16%). Comparing with $Br{\aa}nemark$ implant, Avana implant made of CP grade II titanium showed similar good bone healing, formation and osseointegration.

Keywords