DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of several computational turbulence models with full-scale measurements of flow around a building

  • Wright, N.G. (School of Civil Engineering, The University of Nottingham) ;
  • Easom, G.J. (School of Civil Engineering, The University of Nottingham)
  • Published : 1999.12.25

Abstract

Accurate turbulence modeling is an essential prerequisite for the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in Wind Engineering. At present the most popular turbulence model for general engineering flow problems is the ${\kappa}-{\varepsilon}$ model. Models such as this are based on the isotropic eddy viscosity concept and have well documented shortcomings (Murakami et al. 1993) for flows encountered in Wind Engineering. This paper presents an objective assessment of several available alternative models. The CFD results for the flow around a full-scale (6 m) three-dimensional surface mounted cube in an atmospheric boundary layer are compared with recently obtained data. Cube orientations normal and skewed at $45^{\circ}$ to the incident wind have been analysed at Reynolds at Reynolds number of greater than $10^6$. In addition to turbulence modeling other aspects of the CFD procedure are analysed and their effects are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Baetke, F & Werner, H. (1990), "Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over surface mounted obstacles with sharp edges and corners", Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 35, 129-147, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(90)90213-V
  2. Castro, I.P & Robins, A.G. (1977), "The flow around a surface mounted cube in a uniform & turbulent shear flow" , J. of Fluid Mech., 79, 307-335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112077000172
  3. CFX International, Harwell. (1997), UK, 'CFX-4.2 User Manual'.
  4. Cook, N.J. (1986), "The designers guide to wind loading on building structures part 1" , Butterworths, London, England.
  5. Easom, G.J. (1997), "Improved computational models for wind engineering" , Internal Report No. FR97016, School of Civil Engineering, The University of Nottingham, U.K
  6. FLUENT Inc. (1995), 'FLUENT User Manual'.
  7. Gaskell, P.H. & Lau, A.K.C. (1988), "Curvature compensated convective transport: SMART, A new boundedness preserving transport algorithm" , Int. J. Num. Meth. in Eng., 8, 617-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650080602
  8. Hanjalic, K, Obi, S. and HadziC, I. (1988), "Wall-jets and flows over wall-mounted cubical obstacles" , 6th ERCOFTAC/IAHR/COST Workshop on Refined Flow Modelling.
  9. Hoxey, R.P, Private Communication, 1999.
  10. Launder, B.E & Spalding, D.B. (1974), "The numerical computation of turbulent flows", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
  11. Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J. & Rodi, W. (1975), "Progress in the development of a Reynolds stress turbulence closure" , J. Fluid Mech., 68, 537-566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001814
  12. Leschziner, M.A. (1995), "Modelling turbulence in physically complex flows", Industrial Hydraulics and Multiphase flows - Hydro 2000, Thomas Telford, London, England.
  13. Murakami, S. (1993), "Comparison of various turbulence models applied to a bluff body", Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 46 & 47, 21-36, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  14. Murakami, S., Mochida, A. & Ooka, R. (1993), "Numerical simulation of flowfield over a surfacemounted cube with various second-moment closure models" , Ninth Symposium on turbulent shear flows, Kyoto, Japan.
  15. Murakami, S. (1997), "Overview of turbulence models applied in CWE", Institute of Ind. Science, Univ. Tokyo, Japan.
  16. Orzag, S.A (1994), Lecture notes of ICASE/LaRC short course on Turbulence Modeling & Prediction, March 1994 in Gatski T.B, Hussaini M.Y & Lumley J.L 1996, "Simulation and modeling of turbulent flows" , Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  17. Patankar, S.V. and Spalding, D.B. (1972), "A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows" , Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15, 1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(72)90054-3
  18. Richards, PJ. and Hoxey, R.P. (1993), "Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the ${\kappa}-{\varepsilon}$ turbulence model" , Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 46-47, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90124-7
  19. Smagorinsky, J.S. (1963), "General circulation experiments with primitive equations, Part 1; basic experiments", Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99-164. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2
  20. Spalding, D.B (1972), "A novel finite difference formulation for differential expressions involving both the first and second derivatives" , Int. J. Numerical Methods in Eng., 4, 551. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620040409
  21. Speziale, C.G (1994), Lecture notes of ICASE/LaRC Short course on Turbulence Modeling & Prediction, March 1994 in Gatski T.B, Hussaini M.Y & Lumley J.L 1996, 'Simulation and Modeling of Turbulent Flows', Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  22. Stone, H.L. (1968), "Iterative solution of implicit approximations of multidimensional partial differential equations" , SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5(3), 530-558. https://doi.org/10.1137/0705044
  23. Tsuchiya, M., Murakami S., Mochida, A., Kondo, K & Ishida, Y. (1996), "Development of a new ${\kappa}-{\varepsilon}$model for flow & pressure fields around a bluff body", CWE96, Second International Symposium on CWE, Colorado State University, U.S.A.
  24. Webster, R (1998), "Efficient algebraic multigrid solvers with elementary restriction and prolongation" , Int. J. Num. Meth. in Fluids, 28(2), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19980815)28:2<317::AID-FLD720>3.0.CO;2-K
  25. Williams, C.W & Baker, C.J. (1990), "Appraisal of a semi-empirical model for the pressure field beneath roof comer vortices" , Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, U.K.
  26. Yakhot, V., Orzag, S.A, Thamgam, S., Gatski, T.B. & Speziale, C.G. (1992), "Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique", Physics of Fluids: A: Fluid Dynamics, 4(7), 1510-1520. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858424

Cited by

  1. Consistent boundary conditions for flows within the atmospheric boundary layer vol.99, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.10.009
  2. Computational modeling of wind flow over the University of Calgary campus vol.40, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X16642082
  3. Wind-induced interference effects on low-rise buildings with gable roof vol.170, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.07.009
  4. Pressures on a cubic building—Part 1: Full-scale results vol.102, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.11.004
  5. A comparative investigation of the TTU pressure envelope -Numerical versus laboratory and full scale results vol.5, pp.2_3_4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.2_3_4.337
  6. Evaluation of the atmospheric RAMS model in an obstacle resolving configuration vol.10, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9167-y
  7. Prediction of wind environment and thermal comfort at pedestrian level in urban area vol.96, pp.10-11, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.033
  8. Non-linear k–ε turbulence model results for flow over a building at full-scale vol.27, pp.12, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(03)00123-9
  9. The numerical wind tunnel for industrial aerodynamics: Real or virtual in the new millennium? vol.5, pp.2_3_4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.2_3_4.193
  10. Wind loads on low buildings: in the wake of Alan Davenport's contributions vol.91, pp.12-15, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.019
  11. Experimental and numerical study of wind pressures on irregular-plan shapes vol.93, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.08.008
  12. Numerical simulation of the impact of different vegetation species on the outdoor thermal environment vol.18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.05.008
  13. Predicting the influence of subtropical trees on urban wind through wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations vol.57, pp.None, 1999, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102116
  14. Improving the Energy Efficiency of Buildings Based on Fluid Dynamics Models: A Critical Review vol.14, pp.17, 1999, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175384