A Comparative Study of Quantitative Assessment of Bone Mineral Density of the Mandible

하악골 골염도의 정량적 평가에 관한 비교연구

  • Park Won-Kyl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choi Eui-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim Jae-Duk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 박원길 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강학안면방사선학 교실) ;
  • 최의환 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강학안면방사선학 교실) ;
  • 김재덕 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강학안면방사선학 교실)
  • Published : 1999.02.01

Abstract

This study was performed to compare the bone mineral densities measured at mandibular premolar area by copper-equivalent image and hydroxyapatite phantom with those measured at radius by dual energy absorptiometry and to evaluate the clinical usefulness of Digital system with slide scanner, copper-equivalent image, and hydroxyapatite phantom. For experiment. intraoral radiograms of 15 normal subjects ranged from 20 years old to 67 old were taken with copper-step wedge at mandibular premolar area and bone mineral densities calculated by conversion equation to bone mineral density of hydroxyapatite were compared with those measured at radius distal 1/3 area by Hologic QDR-1000. Obtained results as follows: 1) The conversion equation was Y=5.97X-0.25 and its determination coefficient was 0.9967. The coefficient of variation in the measurement of copper-equivalent value ranged from 4% to 8% and showed high reproducibility. 2) The coefficient of variation in the measurement of bone mineral density by the equation ranged from 7% to 8% and showed high reproducibility. 3) The bone mineral densities ranged from 0.35 to 0.79g/cm2 at mandibular premolararea. 4) The correlation coefficient between bone mineral densities at mandibular premolar area and those at radius distal 1/3 area was 0.8965. As summary, digital image analyzing system using copper-equivalent image and hydroxyapatite phantom appeared to be clinically useful to measure the bone mineral density at dental area.

Keywords