Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Zaltoprofen on Lumbago

요통증에 대한 잘토프로펜의 유효성 및 안정성 평가를 위한 제 III 상 임상시험

  • Cho, Yong-Eun (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Han-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Keung-Nyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chin, Dong-Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chin, Byung-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Rhim, Seung-Chul (Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Oh, Seung-Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Jung-Yong (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 조용은 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김한성 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김긍년 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 진동규 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 진병호 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김영수 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 임승철 (울산대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 오성훈 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 안정용 (연세대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실)
  • Published : 1999.12.30

Abstract

OBJECTIVE : Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs(NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of a number of arthritic conditions or lumbago, but gastrointestinal lesions have often limited their clinical utilization. Zaltoprofen is a new propionic acid derivative provided with marked antiiflammatory, antiarthritic, analgesic and antipyretic activities in previous Japanese clinical trials. A comparative, randomized, double blind clinical trial was designed to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of zaltaprofen(ZP) compared to ketoprofen(KP) in the treatment of lumbago. MATERIALS AND METHODS : A total of 191 adult patients (66 males and 125 females) suffering from lumbago participated in this double-blind, multicenter trial of 25-weeks duration. Using the randomization table, 96 patients(ZP group) were treated with 3 tablets daily of Zaltoprofen 80mg and placebo for 2 weeks; the other 95 patients(KP group) took 3 tablets daily of Ketoprofen 50mg and placebo for 2 weeks. The therapeutic efficacy was assessed using parameters, measured in baseline conditions and after 7, 14 days of treatment : 1) Subjective pain scale measured using visual analogue scale 2) Objective range of motion (Flexion, extension, abduction and rotation). The safety was assessed by : 1) Appearance during the study of subjective and objective side effects 2) Laboratory tests performed before study commencement and at the end of the therapy. The parametric and non-parametric data were analysed statistically using t-test, paired t-test, repeated measures of ANOVA and Chi-square test. RESULTS : Therapy with ZP or KP produced a marked improvement in subjective pain scale and objective range of motion in both groups of patients (p<0.0001 and p<0.05). But No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. 20 of 96 patients (20.83%) treated with ZP and 37 of 95 patients (38.95% ) treated with KP had side effects. 20 patients treated with ZP and 34 patients treated with KP had the gastrointestinal complaints. But the side effect was short-lasting and was disappeared a few days after discontinuation of therapy. The laboratory tests in both groups showed no statistically significant variations. CONCLUSION : Zaltoprofen provides an excellent therapeutic weapon for the treatment of lumbago. It possesses a marked analgesic activity and induces a satisfactory improvement of the range of motion and is generally equivalent to that achieved with ketoprofen. On the other hand, the frequency of side effects in zaltoprofen group is lower than that of ketoprofen group.

Keywords