The Effects of DFDB combined with Dura mater on the Periodontal Wound Healing of Dehiscence Defects in Dogs

성견 열개형 결손부에 DFDB이식과 Dura Mater막의 효과

  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Il-Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hee (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Suh, Jong-Jin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Jung, Hyun-Chul (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김일영 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 김영희 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 서종진 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 정현철 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실 치주조직 재생연구소)
  • Published : 1998.06.30

Abstract

The present study invetigates the effects of root planing only(control group), DFDBA alone(test group 1) and combined use of DFDB and Dura mater(test group 2) in dehiscence defects in dogs. The results of 8weeks post-surgery by histological comparison between the three groups are as follows. 1. The contol group showed minimum regeneration of new cementum and new bone with limited migration of epitheilal cells, and healed by connective tissue attachment. 2. The test group 1 showed minimum regeneration of new cementum and new bone with limited migration of epitheilal cells, and healed by connective tissue attachment. 3. The test group 2 showed significant amount of the new cementum and new bone. 4. Both control and test groups healed without any observable root resorption and ankylosis. The above the results suggest that the use of resorbable Dura mater only does not improve the regeneration of new bone and periodontal ligament due to difficulties of space making, but the combined use with DFDB may be more effective.

Keywords