An Application of Delphi Method to the Assessment of Current Status of Cancer Research

델파이법을 적용한 암연구수준의 평가

  • Khang, Young-Ho (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Seok-Jun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Gil-Won (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Yup (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Keun-Young (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Young-Soo (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 강영호 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 윤석준 (단국대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 강길원 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 김창엽 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 유근영 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 신영수 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실)
  • Published : 1998.12.01

Abstract

Globally, cancer research has been considered one of the most important field of biomedical researches. Recently, in Korea, there are increasing concerns about cancer research and the development of national cancer control programme. For the efficient investment in cancer research at the national level, strategic approach is needed based on the nationwide information about current status of research. However even the basic data on cancer research have not been systematically collected, and are not available when necessary. The aim of this study is to assess current status of cancer research. For this purpose, this study applied two round Delphi method in which fifteen experts in cancer research fields participated. They rated each items on the initial list at the first round, and modified their responses at the second round. Panels responded that pathogenesis of cancer, research & development of cancer drug, and oncogene, etc. are the most urgent and important research Holds. They assessed national level of cancer research as being 49.6% of the world highest level. Coefficient of variation tended to be lowered with the iteration. Predictive stability was evaluated to be lower in items of urgency than in items of importance and research level. Although this study shares the same limitations in the selection of the experts with many other Delphi studies, it provides a primary data that would be required to plan the national strategy of the cancer research.

Keywords