The relationship between the TMJ internal derangement state including rotational displacement and perforation and the clinical characteristics

회전변위와 천공을 포함한 측두하악관절 내장증 상태와 임상적 특징간의 상호관계

  • Jeong Hwan-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology & Dental Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • You Dong-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology & Dental Research Institute, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 정환석 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실 및 치학연구소) ;
  • 유동수 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실 및 치학연구소)
  • Published : 1998.02.01

Abstract

This study was designed to reveal the correlationship between the internal derangement state of TMJ and clinical characteristics including pain and mandibular dysfunction. One hundred and twenty five subjects with TMJ signs and symptoms were chosen for two years. The level of pain and madibular dysfunction were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale(VAS) and Craniomandibular Index(CMI). The diagnostic categories of TMJ internal derangement were determined by arthrography and they included normal disc position, anterior disc displacement with reduction(ADDR), rotational disc displacement with reduction (RDDR), anterior disc displacement without reduction(ADDNR), and rotational disc displacement without reduction(RDDNR). Also disc perforation was used as a criteria to divide the diagnostic subgroups. The obtained results were as follows; 1. The patient distribution of each group was 5 in normal disc position(4%), 40 in ADDR(32%), 30 in RDDR(24%), 34 in ADDNR(27%), and 16 in RDDNR(13%). 2. Perforation was observed in 8% of ADDR, 10% of RDDR, 32% of ADDNR, and 19% of RDDNR. 3. CMI of non-reduction group was higher than that of reduction or normal group(p<0.05), but V AS showed no significant difference.4. CMI of perforation group was higher than that of non-perforation group in reduction group (p<0.05). 5. There were no significant differences of CMI and VAS between anterior disc displacement group and rotational disc displacement group in both reduction and non-reduction group. 6. CMI of RDDNR group was higher than that of RDDR group(p<0.05). 7. There were no significant difference of CMI and VAS between bilateral involvement group and unilateral involvement group(p<0.05).

Keywords