An Approach to the Analysis of Landscape Heterogeneity in Seoul Metropolitan Suburbs

서울시 주변지역의 경관이질성 변화 분석기법 개발을 위한 기초연구

  • 안동만 (서울대 조경학과) ;
  • 박은관 (서울대 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 김인호 (서울대 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 김명수 (서울대 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 박소영 (서울대 대학원 생태조경학과)
  • Published : 1998.10.01

Abstract

Natural or human disturbances cause landscape changes, which may be measured by the degree of heterogeneity. In a 16km$\times$19km area, divided into 100m$\times$100m cells, of Seoul city and its suburb, land covers are classified into 6 groups in aerial photos and land use maps. The degree of heterogeneity is defined as the number of cells that surround a central cell but have different land cover from the central cell divided by 8. The value of the degree of heterogeneity is between 0 and 1. Major findings are 1) Both urban and natural areas have low degree of heterogeneity, about 0.15~0.17. 2) Suburban area under heavy pressure of development and urbanization has highest degree of heterogeneity, about 0.25. 3) The peak of the degree of heterogeneity moved about 4.5km outward in 22 years. 4) Outer suburban area has lower degree of heterogeneity as the area is a greenbelt or forest. 5) The results show the areas with higher degree of heterogeneity which may need landscape management plans, and natural areas with lower degree of heterogeneity which may need landscape conservation plans. A landscape change model may be built for a specific city when this technique is applied to multiple sectors of the city, and the model may predict future landscape changes of the city.

Keywords

References

  1. OIKOS v.71 no.3 Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review Andren, Henrik
  2. Landscape and Urban Planning v.28 Optimizing Habitat Fragmentation: an agrolandscape perspective Barrett, G. W;J. D. Peles
  3. Landscape and Urban Planning v.11 The Recent Evolution of Farming Landscape in Urban-Centred Regions Bryant, C. R
  4. OIKOS v.66 no.1 Spatial Heterogeneity against Heteroscedasticity: an ecological paradigm versus a statistical concept Dutilleul, P;P. Legendre
  5. Landscape Ecology Forman, R. T. T;M. Godren
  6. Wildlife, Forests, and forestry, englewood Cliffs, N. J. Hunter, M. L
  7. Landscae Heterogeneity and Disturbance Parasites, lighting, and the vegetation mosaic in wilderness landscape Knight, D. H;Turner, M. G(ed.)
  8. Ecological Heterogeneity Kolasa, J;C. D. Rollo
  9. OIKOS v.73 no.2 On Definition and Quantification of Heterogeneity Li, H;J. F. Reynolds
  10. Ecology v.75 no.8 A Simulation Experiment to Quantify Spatial Heterogeneity in Categorical Maps Lim H;J. F. Reynolds
  11. Landscae Heterogeneity and Disturbance Scale effects in landscape studies Meentemeyer, V;E. O. Box;Turner, M. G(ed.)
  12. Science v.269 Landscape Ecology : Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems Pickett, S. T. A;M. L. Cadenasso
  13. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics Pickett, S. T. A;P. S. White(eds)
  14. Landscape and Urban Planning v.18 Heterogeneity in Agriculture and Landscape: From Segregation to Integration Primdahl, J
  15. Landscae Heterogeneity and Disturbance Landscape Ecology : Stste of the Art Risser, P. G;Turner, M. G(ed.)
  16. Bioscience v.32 Landscape Diversity : the Concept Applied to Yellowstone Park Romme, W. H;D. H. Knight
  17. Landscae Heterogeneity and Disturbance Vegetational Dynamics in a Southern Wisconsin Landscape in Turner Shape, D. M(et al);Turner, M. G(ed.)
  18. Landscae Heterogeneity and Disturbance Turner, M. G(ed.)
  19. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology Turner, M. G;R. H. Gardner(eds)
  20. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology Modeling Landscape Distrubance in Turner Turner, M. G(et al);Turner, M. G(ed.);R. H. Gardner(ed.)
  21. Mosaic Landscape and Ecological Process Landscape mosaic and Ecological Process Weins, J. A;Hansson. L(ed.);L. Fahrig(ed.);G. Merriam(ed.)