In Situ Monitoring of Biofilm Formations of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida by Use of Lux and GFP Reporters

  • Khang, Youn-Ho (Department of Applied Microbiology, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Rober S. Burlage (Environmental Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
  • Published : 1998.06.01

Abstract

A plasmid vector containing two reporter genes, mer-lux and lac-GFP, was transformed to both Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida. Their cellular activities and biofilm characteristics were investigated in flow-cell units by measuring bioluminescent lights and fluorescent levels of GFP. Bioluminescence was effective to monitor temporal cell activities, whereas fluorescent level of GFP was useful to indicate the overall cell activities during biofilm development. The light production rates of E. coli and P. putida cultures were dependent upon concentrations of HgCl2. Mercury molecules entrapped in P. putida biofilms were hardly washed out in comparison with those in E. coli biofilms, indicating that P. putida biofilms may have higher affinity to mercury molecules than E. coli biofilms. It was observed that P. putida expressed GFP cDNA in biofilms but not in liquid cultures. This may indicate that the genetic mechanisms of P. putida were favorably altered in biofilm conditions to make a foreign gene expression possible.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends. Biotech. v.9 Understanding bacterial biofilms Blenkinsopp,S.A.;J.W.Costerton
  2. NATO ASI series E v.223 Biofilms-science and technology Melo, L. F.;T. R. Bott;M. Fletcjer;B. Capdeville
  3. J. Dent. Res v.72 The level of mercury in human dental plaque and interaction in vitro between biofilms of Streptococcus mutants and dental amalgam Lyttle,H.A.;G.H. Bowden
  4. Wat. Res. v.13 Metal removal in activated sludge: the role of bacterial extracellular polymers Brown, M.;J. N. Lester
  5. Wat. Res. v.27 Accumulation of mercury (Ⅱ) and methylmercury by microbial biofilms Hintelmann, H.;R. Ebinghaus;R. D. Wilken
  6. Ann. Rev. Microbiol v.42 Plasmid-mediated heavy metal resistances Silver, S.;T. K. Misra
  7. J. Bacteriol v.174 A merlux transcriptional fusion for real-time examination of in vivo gene expression kinetics and promoter response to altered superhelicity Condee C. W.;A. O. Summers
  8. Anal. Chem. v.67 A luminescence-based mercury biosensor Virta, M.;J. Lampinen;Karp, M.
  9. Biotechnol. Bioeng v.47 Membrane-attached biofilms for VOC wastewater treatment 1: Novel in situ biofilm thickness measurement technique Freitas dos Santos, L. M.;A. G. Livingston
  10. Science v.203 Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression Chalfie, M.;Y. Tu;G. Euskirchen;W. W. Ward;D. C. Prasher
  11. Nat. Biotechnol v.14 Improved green fluorescent protein by molecular evolution using DNA shuffling Crameri,A.;E.A. Whitehorn;E. Tate;W.P.C. Stemmer
  12. Current protocols in molecular biology Ausubel, F. M.;R. Brent;R. E. Kingston;D. D. Moore;J. G. Seidman;J. A. Smith;K. Struhl
  13. Appl. Environ. Microbiol v.59 Bioluminescence sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(Ⅱ) in the environment Selifonova, O.;R. Burlage;T. Barkay
  14. Microb. Ecol v.33 Spatial distribution and coexistence of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms Stewart, P. S.;A. K. Camper;S. D. Handran;C.-T. Huang;M. Warnecke
  15. Microb. Ecol v.14 Behaviour of Pseudomonas fluorescens within the hydrodynamic boundary layers of surface microenvironments Lawrence, J. R.;P. J. Delaquis;D. R. Korber;D. E. Caldwell
  16. Biotechnol. Bioeng v.53 Measurements of local diffusion coefficients in biofilms by microinjection and confocal microscopy DeBeer, D.;P. Stoodley;Z. Lewandowski
  17. Biotechnol. Bioeng v.46 Biofilm parameters influencing biocide efficacy Srinivasan, R.;P.S.Stewart;T.Griebe;C. I. Chen;X. Xu