MRI 분포와 관행수가 현황 및 촬영실적 분석

Current Status of MRI Distribution, Prevailing Charges and Analysis of Its Performance

  • 발행 : 1998.06.01

초록

There exists a remarkable differences in use of MRI scanning among income classes. The poor can hardly utilize it. This is because, among high cost technnologies, MRI is the only equipment not covered under health insurance benefits in Korea. This study was designed 1) to reveal the status of nation-wide MRI installation, customary charges and per unit annual scanning performance, and 2) to analyse factors influencing the above variables. The data for this study came from "MRI Prevalence Survey" conducted by the National Federation of Medcial Insurance(NFMI) in 1997, and were analyzed through SAS packages for T-test, analysis of variance and stepwise multiple regression. Data were collected from 188 hospitals equipped with MRI scanners. Major findings are summarized as follows : The number of MRI scanners has increased from 69 in 994 to 158 in 1996(2.3 times) while per unit annual scanning performance has risen by 11.2% from 2,173 cases in 1994 to 2,417 cases in 1996. Such a rapid increase was made possible mainly due to the inclusion of CT scanning under the health insurance benefit package. The customary charges for MRI scanning with or without contrast media, on average, amounted to 484,000 Won and 402,000 Won, respectively, with the percentile increase of 17.8% and 8.1% each during the same time. Korea ranks the third worldwidely in terms of number of MRI installations, 4.8 scanners per one million persons, only next to Japan and United States. Geographical variation of MRI, however, was rather high, 7.91 unit, in Cheju area compared to 1.82 in Kyongnam area. Variations of customary charges of MRI scanning can be explained as much as by 44.8% by both the total amount of claims to NFMI and geographical variable. The charges were more likely to be higher in metropolitan areas like Seoul and in hospitals with a bigger amount of claims. While those of per unit annual scanning performance can be explained as much as by 30.7% by both MRI installation cost and level of MRI-installed organizations. Per capital scannig performance was higher in tertiary hospitals and hospitals equipped with more expensive scanners than hospitals with less expensive scanners. Two measures are called for the remedying the existing excessive abundance in MRI units in korea : One is to set a ceiling of MRI units in an area like a province or a metropolitan district. The other is to establish a committee on introduction of high cost technologies for reviewing its effective use.ctive use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 한국보건행정학회지 v.2 no.2 우리나라 MRI 이용의 사회경제적 특성 김루시아;문옥륜
  2. 한국의료보험론 문옥륜
  3. 의료보장개혁과제와 정책방향 의료보장개혁위원회
  4. 의료장비의 수급과 정부의 역할. 국민의료와 정부의 역할 문옥륜
  5. 국민보건연구소 연구논총 v.6 no.2 CT 촬영관행수가의 현황과 그 변이에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구 문옥륜 (외)
  6. 고가특수의료장비 설치승인 신청현황 및 심의자료 고가특수의료장비 설치승인 심사위원회
  7. 병원경영학회 v.2 no.1 CT 보험급여 전후의 CT 및 MRI 검사의 이용량과 수익성 변화 서종록;유승흠;전기홍;남정모
  8. 서울대학교 의학석사 학위논문 우리나라 CT 도입과 확산 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 윤석준
  9. 서울대학교 보건대학원 석사학위논문 고가의료장비 수급정책변화에 관한 연구 최상은
  10. 보건학논집 v.33 no.1 의료서비스의 본인부담가격 양봉민
  11. 고가특수의료장비 설치승인 심사위원회 심의자료 보건복지부
  12. Health care technology and its assessment - an international perspective Banta D;Luce BR
  13. AJR v.43 The adoption and diffusion of a new imaging technology : a MRI prospective Hillman AL(et al)
  14. Introduction to health services(fourth edition) Luce BR