A PHOTOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS ON TOOTH SUPPORTING STRUCTURE AND RESIDUAL RIDGE ACCORDING TO DENTURE DESIGN FOR REMAINING MANDIBULAR CANINES

하악 견치 잔존시 의치 설계에 따른 치아 지지조직 및 잔존치조제의 광탄성 응력분석

  • Kim, Il-Pyung (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Koh, Joon-Won (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jin, Tai-Ho (Dept. of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 김일평 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 고준원 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 진태호 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 1997.11.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress patterns developed in abutment and residual ridge according to removable denture design in case of remaining mandibular canines. The removable denture designs in this study were as foolows : 1. Removable partial denture with non-splinted abutment 2. Removable partial denture with splinted abutment 3. Overdenture with telescopic crown 4. Overdenture with O-Ring attachment 5. Overdenture with combination bar attachment Photoelastic stress analysis was used to record the isochromatic fringe patterns and to calculate principal stress components at measuring points. The results were as follows : 1. In case of removable partial denture with non-splinted abutment, stress of root area at the loaded side was the largest. No significant differences in stress of root area were observed between loaded side and unloaded side. 2. No significant differences in stress of residual ridge at the loaded side were observed between removable partial denture with splinted abutment and removable partial denture with non-splinted abutment. 3. In case of combination bar attachment retained overdenture, stress of root area was the largest and in case of telescopic crown retained overdenture, stress of root area was the lowest. 4. In case of attachment retained overdenture, stress of residual ridge was lower but stress of root area was larger than in case of removable partial denture.

Keywords