The effect of landscape meaning on landscape assessment focused on the interaction with scenic beauty, people\\`s purpose and socio-cultural experience

경관의 의미와 경관평가에 관한 연구 - 경관의 미적 특질, 사람들의 목적 및 사회 문화적 경험과의 관련성을 중심으로 -

  • Published : 1997.01.01

Abstract

Past research suggests that a landscape has a specific situational meaning that is comprized of physical, social, and functional dimensions. and that the meaning: influences person/landscape interactions. In this study. the effect of landscape meaning on three landscape assessment(scenic beauty assessment, picnic preference, living preference) was tested by manipulating landscape meaning in three ways: Korean-positive, Korean-neutral, American-positive The results showed that landscape ,meaning played an important role in determining cognitive interactions and affective experiences of landscapes. However, it should be notch that the beneficial effect of positive meaning on landscape experiences depended on people's tasks and levels of oflandscape beauty. The effect was larger for both picnic preference (than scenic beauty and living preference) and low-beauty landscape (than the high-beauty) . The results also showed that the beneficial effect of positive meaning depended on the relationship between talc nature of positive meaning and measurement context.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국조경학회지 v.22 no.2 경관선호와 평가에 있어서 개인적 차이 및 유사성에 대한 이해와 그 중요성에 대한 고찰 이영경
  2. The Experience of Landscape Appleton,J.
  3. Feelings and Emotions:The Loyola Symposium Arnolds
  4. Environment and Behavior v.14 Development of visual ppreference for natural environments Balling,j.d.;Falk,j.h.
  5. Journal of Environmental Management v.16 Landscape preference metrics:an intermational comparison Buhyoff,G.J.;Wellman,J.D.;Kock,N.E.;Gauthier,I.;Hultman,S.
  6. Journal of Leisure Research v.12 A landscape architects interpretations of people's landscape preferences Buyoff,G.J.;Wellman,J.D.;Harvey,H.;Fraser,R.A.
  7. A System of Landscape Dimensions: Appraisals of its Objectivity of its Scientific Applicaand Illustrationtion Craik,K.H.
  8. The meaning of things:Domestic symbols and the self Csikszentmihalyi,M.;Rochberg-Halton,E.
  9. Human Behavior and Environment v.6 Methodogical issues in the assessment of landscape quality Daniel,t.;Wining,J.;In,I.Altman(ed.);J.Wohlwill(ed.)
  10. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.Ft.collins,CO:Rochy Moutain Forest and Range Experimant Station Measuring Landscape aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method Daniel,t.;Boster,R.S.
  11. journal of Environmental Psychology v.9 The beauty and the beast: some preliminary comparisons of'high'versus'popular' residential architecture and public versus architect judgementof same Devin,K.;Nasar,j.l.
  12. Unpublished manuscript, univ. of IIIinois Limitations of aggregation Diener,E.;Willson,D.W.
  13. Beyond interpretation: Toward a Recised Theory for Pschoanalysis Gedo,J.E.
  14. Journal Environmental Psychology v.3 Meaning in post-modern architecture: an examination using multiplesortingtask Groat,L.
  15. In EDRA 1 Preceedings of the First Annual Environmental Design Research Association Conference A study of meaning and architecture Hershberger,R.G.
  16. Priciples of Behavior Hull,D.L.
  17. Landscape and Urban Planning v.15 Change in landscape Hull,R.B.Ⅳ.;McCarthy,m.
  18. Journal of Environmental Psychology v.9 Cross-cultural com-parisons of landscape scenic beauty evaluations:a case study in Bali Hull,R.b.Ⅳ.;Revell,G.R.
  19. Behavior and the Natural Environment v.6 The role of nature in the urban context. Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Reseach Kaplan,R.;I.Altman(ed.);J.F.Wohlwill(ed.)
  20. Environment & Behavior v.19 no.1 Aesthetic. affect. & cognition: environmental preference from anevolutionary perspective Kaplan,S.
  21. Preception and Psychophysics v.12 Rated preperence and complexity for naturaland urban visual material Kaplan,S.;Kaplan,R.;Wendt,J.S.
  22. Design and Analysis; A Researcher's Handbook Keppel,G.
  23. AmercanPsychologist v.37 no.9 Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition Lazarus,R.S.
  24. Mind and Body:Psychology of emotion and stress Mandler,G.
  25. Plans and the Structure of Behavior Miller,G.A.;Galanter,E.;Pribram,k.
  26. Landscape Meanings and Values An ecological and evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics Orians,G.;Penning Roswell,E.C.(ed.);d.Lowenthal(ed.)
  27. Journal of Personality and Social Pschology v.34 A free-Response description approach to the analysis ofperson-situation interaction Pervin,L.A.
  28. American Journal of Community Psychology v.3 no.4 Explorations in the taxonomy of behavioralsettings Price,R.H.;Blanshfield,R.K.
  29. A Non-verbal Communication Approach Meaning of the Built Environment Rapoport,A.
  30. Handbook of Environmental Pschology v.Ⅱ Emotion and Environment Russell,J.A.;Snodgrass,J.
  31. Envionmental Perception and Behavior Environmental perception and adaptation level in the Arctic Sonnenfield,J.;D.Lowenthal(ed.)
  32. Behavior and Natural Environment v.6 Aesthetic and affective responses to natural environments Ulrich,R.;Altman(ed.);J.F.Wohlwill(ed.)
  33. Man Environment System v.7 Buliding imagery: a comparative study of Environmental cognition Venderbrer,S.;Moore,G.T.
  34. The concept of natureia psychologist's view Wohlwill,J.F.;I.Alman;J.F.
  35. Human Behavior and Environment v.1 Wohlwill(Eds.)
  36. Motivation and Emotion Young,P.T.
  37. Landsape Architure v.63 Rating everyday rural landscape of the Northestern U.S. Zube,E.h.
  38. Environment and Behavior v.6 Cross-disciplinary and intemode agreement on the description andevaluation of landscape resources Zube,E.H.
  39. Landscape Planning v.8 Cross-cultural perceptions of scenic and heritage landscape Zube,E.H.;Pitt,D.G.