Evaluation of the Strength Required in Current Seismic Design Code

현행 내진설계 규준의 수평강도 요구에 대한 평가

  • Published : 1997.12.01

Abstract

Current seismic design code is based on the assumption that the designed structures would be behaved inelastically during a severe earthquake ground motion. For this reason, seismic design forces calculated by seismic codes are much lower than the forces generated by design earthquakes which makes structures responding elastically. Present procedures for calculating seismic design forces are based on the use of elastic spectra reduced by a strength reduction factors known as "response modificaion factor". Because these factors were determined empirically, it is difficult to know how much inelastic behaviors of the structures exhibit. In this study, lateral strength required to maintain target ductility ratio was first calculated from nonlinear dynamic analysis of the single degree of freedom system. At the following step, base shear foeces specified in seismic design code compare with above results. If the base shear force required to maintain target ductility ratio was higher than the code specified one, the lack of required strength should be filled by overstrength and/or redundancy. Therefore, overstrength of moment resisting frame structure will be estimated from the results of push-over analysis.

현행 내진설계 규준에서 사용하고 있는 반응수정계수는 설계지진하중과 유사한 지진발생시 구조물이 비선형 거동을 하도록 탄성응답에서 요구되는 밑면전단력 값을 낮추는 계수라 할 수 있다. 따라서 반응수정계수는 하중저감계수(force reduction factor)라고 할 수 있으며, 이러한 값들은 경험적으로 결정된 것이어서 예상지진에 대하여 구조설계자가 설계한 건물이 어느정도의 비선형 거동을 할지는 예측하기가 힘들다. 본 연구에서는 목표가 되는 연성비(target ductility ratio)에 따라 요구되는 밑면전단력의 값을 구하고 이를 규준에서 요구하는 값과 비교할 것이다. 만약 요구되는 값이 규준 값 보다 크다면 이는 구조물이 가지는 부가강도(overstrength)나 잉여력(redundancy)이 담당해야 한다. 모멘트연성골조 건물을 설계한 후 이를 push-over 해석에 의하여 부가강도를 찾아 보아 요구강도와 비교할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 내진설계 지침서 작성에 관한 연구 대한건축학회
  2. Proceedings of Tenth European Conference on Earth-quake Engineering New Trends in Seismic Design Methodology H. Krawinkler
  3. Provisions and Commentary NEHRP Recommended Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulation for New Buildings, Part 1 and 2 Building Seismic Safety Council
  4. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No. 90 Strength and Ductility Considerations in Seismic Design J. D. Osteraas;H. Krawinkler
  5. Proceedings of 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering v.5 An Investigation of Structural Respose Modification Factors Christopher Rojahn
  6. Applied Technology Council Report ATC 3- 06, 2nd Printing Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings ATC
  7. National Hazard Reduction Program Report NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council BSSC