User's responses to the type of campus layouts -Based on perceived safety and landscape visual preferences-

"캠퍼스" 공간설계 유형에 따른 이용자의 지각반응특성에 관한 연구-안전지각과 시각선호에 대한 비교 분석-

  • 엄붕훈 (대구효성가톨릭대 조경학과) ;
  • 한성미 (대구효성가톨릭대 대학원 환경과학과)
  • Published : 1997.07.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to grasp the characteristics of user's response to perceived safety and visual preferences for outdoor green spaces by the types of campus layouts. This research was investigated by color slide ratings and questionnaire survey to the students who are majoring in Landscape architecture in three universities locating at Taegu area. Two research sites have similarities in many ways but have differences in campus land form and design type such as 'Closed' and 'Open' types. Major results were summarised as follows ; 1. As a result of the slide test, the high degree of visual preference was shown in the campus that is 'Closed' type. However the degree of perceived safety was lower than that of in Youngnam Univ. campus. 2. According to the result of the comparative analysis between user's perceived safety and visual preferences in each campus, the degree of perceived safety at 'Closed' type was lower than that of 'Open' type, but the degree of visual satisfactioni was higher at 'Closed' type. 3. The factors affecting visual preference in campus were shown as density of wood, land form, and diverse type of the spaces. On the other hand, the factors affecting perceived safety were 'enclosed space by wood' at the day time, and 'the condition of lighting' at night. 4. Regarding gender differences in sensation of each space variables, female users showed higher satisfactio on the scenic beauty. 5. Regression analysis showed that general satisfation was determined by the variables such as 'arrangement', familiarity', 'cleanness', and 'closed feeling', in Kyungbook Univ. And in Youngnam Univ. , the variables were 'texture', 'perceived beauty', 'cleanness', and 'complexity' respectively. 6. In conclusion, campus users wanted the outdoor spaces that have various land form and somewhat 'open-closed' mixture type, which has a good 'Edge Effect' to satisfy both aspects in safety and visual preferneces.

Keywords

References

  1. Landscape and Urban Planning no.13 Landscape preference and personality Abello, R. P;F. G. Bernaldez
  2. Environment and Behavior v.14 no.1 Development of visual preference for natural environments Balling, J. D;J. H. Falk
  3. Journal of Environmental Psychology no.13 Nodes, paths and edges: concide-ration on the complexity of crime and the physical environment Brantingham, P. L;P. J. Brantingham
  4. Forest Science v.30 no.1 Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements Buhyoff, G. J;L. J. Gauthier;J. D. Wellman
  5. 한국조경학회지 v.19 no.1 주거환경유형과 거주자의 주거만족 진양교;와이드만;앤더슨
  6. Journal of Environment Management v.10 no.1 A statistic technique for the evaluation of visual quality of the landscape for land-use planning purposes Dearden, P
  7. Landscape Planning no.11 Factors influencing landscape preferences: An empirical investigation Dearden, P
  8. Journal of the Urban Planning and Development Division v.105 no.1 Measuring preferences for natural landscapes Dearing, J. A;M. Asce
  9. Environment and Behavior v.16 no.2 Climate and crime: test of an FBI assumption Defronzo, J
  10. Environment and Behavior v.24 no.1 Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features, prospect, refuge, and escape Fisher, B. S;J. L. Nasar
  11. Environment and Behavior v.15 no.1 Distance and scenic beauty, A Nonmonotonic relationship Hull IV, R. B
  12. Forest Science v.30 no.1 Measurement of scenic beauty: The law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures Hull IV, R. B
  13. Preception & Psychophysics v.12 no.4 Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material Kaplan, S;R. Kaplan;J. S. Wendt
  14. unpublished report Perception of safety in the campus environment Kirt, L. N
  15. 慶熙大學校 碩士 學位論文 夜間 公園利用者의 公共安全性 平價에 關한 硏究 李鍾星
  16. Environment and Behavior v.15 no.4 Demographic correlates of landscape preference Lyons, E
  17. Urban Studies no.14 Defensble space: a theoretical and empirical appraisal Mawby, R. I
  18. Regional Studies no.12 Preferences and perceptions of urban decision-marking groups: Congruence or conflict? Murphy, P. E
  19. Environment and Behavior v.12 no.2 The relationship to crimes of physical reaources O'donnell, C. R;T. Lydgate
  20. Journal of Leisure Research Modeling and Predicting Human Response to the Visual Recreation Environment Peterson, G. L;E. S. Neumann
  21. Journal of Environmental Management v.17 no.2 Prefernces of national nature reserve users Roome, N. J
  22. Journal of Leisure Research v.19 no.4 Prospect Refuge Theory: A Psychological orientation for Edge Effect in recreation environments Ruddel, E. J;W. E. Hammitt
  23. environment and Behavior v.22 no.2 Crime and climate: A reconcideration Simpson, M;J. D. Perry
  24. Landscape and Urban Planning v.13 no.2 The influence of the environmental background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation Tips, W. E. J;T. Savasdisara
  25. Environment and Behavior v.13 no.5 Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects Ulrich, R. S
  26. Landscape and Urban Planning v.13 no.1 Human responses to vegetation and landscape Ulrich, R. S
  27. Environment and Behavior v.15 no.5 Comparing college student's environmental perceptions and attitudes: A methodological investgation Wysor, M. S