Abstract
For Improvement of lung preservation, many tripes of preservation solution were developed and tested. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the most frequently used extracellular type pieservation solution (Low Potassium Dextran, LPD) with a newly developed trehalose containing extracellular type preservation solution(ET-Kyoto, ETK) on postischemic lung function. Twelve New-Zealand white rabbit lungs were harvested and studied on an isolated, blood-perfused model of lung function after 4 hours of cold ischemia at $10^{\circ}C$ In group I (n=6), lungs were preserved with 100 mL/kg of LPD solution; in group II(n=6), lungs were preserved with 100 mL/kg of ETK solution. A few minutes before flushing with preservation solutions, 20$\mu\textrm{g}$ of PGEI were injected into main pulmonary artery. Functions of the preserved lung were compared with PO2, PA pressure, t acheal air pressure, and drylwet ratio. The pulmonary efferent blood oxygen tension at the end of the 60-minute reperfusion period was higher in group II compacted with group I(486.5 $\pm$ 80.3 mmHg versus $432.5\pm82.9$ mmHg at FiO2 1.0, p-value = NS). The mean pulmonary arterial pressure was similar in both $groups.(33.7\pm2.2$ mmHg versus $35.5\pm2.0$ mmHg, p-value : NS). The peak inspiratory airway pressure was significantly lower in group 11(8.010.6 mmHg versus 11.8 $\pm$ 1.4 mmHg, p-value=0.02) The water content of the lung was lower in group II $(70.2\pm6.9%$ versus 78.5 $\pm6.1%),$ but not significant. These data demonstrate that a newly-developed trehalose-containing ET-Kyoto solution yield equal or slightly superior lung function after reperfusion compared with LPD solution.
폐보존방법을 개선시키기 위하여 많은 보존액들이 개발되고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 가장 많이 알려진 세포외액형 폐보존액인 저포타슘 덱스트란(LPD)용액과 tiehalose를 포함하는 새로 개발된 세포외액형 폐보존액인 ET-Kyoto용액의 폐 보존효과를 비교분석하여 앞으로 있을 폐이식에 대비하고자 한 것이다. 12마리의 가토로부터 폐장블록을 적출하여 $10^{\circ}C에서$ 4시간동안 보관한 다음 혈액으로 재순환시키는 폐장분리관류모형을 이용하였다. 각군은 6마리씩의 토끼로 구성되었고 LPD용액과 ETK용액을 각각 100 mL/kg씩 주입하였다. 폐보존액 주입전에 20$\mu\textrm{g}$의 prostaglandin El을 사용하여 폐동맥수축을 예방하였다. 60분간의 재관류후 유출혈액의 산소분압은 Em군에서 LPD군보다 $높았으며(486.5\pm80.3$ mmHg versus 432.5 $\pm$ 82.9 mmHg at FiO2 1.0, p-value = NS), 평균 폐동맥압은 비슷하였다(33.7 $\pm2.2$ mmHg versus $35.5\pm2.0$ mmHg, p-value = NS). 흡기말기도내압은 ETK군에서 현저히 $낮았으며(8.0\pm0.6$ mmHg versus 11.8 $\pm$ 1.4 mmHg, p-value : 0.02), 습윤중량은 두군간의 통계학적인 차이는 $없었다(70.2\pm6.9%$ versus 78.5 $\pm$ 6.1%). 상기 결과로 두가지 \ulcorner보존액은 임상적으로 사용가능할만큼 만족할만한 보존기능을 확인 할 수 있었다. 그러나 두 군간의 보존효과에서는 현저한 차이가 없었다.