공원설계에서 기념성의 문제 -서울대 4.19 기념공원과 서초조각공원의 예-

Some issues on monumentality in park design -two case of 4.19 memorial park of SNU and Soecho sculpture park-

  • 유병림 (서울대 환경대학원 환경조경학과)
  • 발행 : 1996.01.01

초록

The judgement of how good a memorial park is designed in terms of representing symbolic meanings through moonument depends on whether it decisively reflects peoples' common value and affection to specific event or place of the park. It is in fact, not easy to define the kind of value and affections peoples have in mind for the park. It is likely that most park design concepts are primarily based on designer' subjective view of the world by which the public is expected to understand, accept, and eventually share the common symbolic meanings of the park. AS memorial park design as the works of art might be appreciated not only in view of artistic performance of designer but in terms of its social meaning of the newly defined space. Two cases of park designs by author include issues on conceptual alternatives, experience of memorial space, symbolic use of materials, and perspectives on the direction of contemporary park design. It is noteworthy that authentic approaches should be challenged for a new way in which symbolic meanings could be given in rather contradictory style.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Landscape Architecture The FDR Menorial Thomas Aidala
  2. Landscape Architecture Proposal for a holocaust memorial Lawrence Halprin and Robert Graham
  3. Designing the New Landscape by Geoffrey Jellicoe Parc de la villete Bernard Tschumi
  4. Modern Landscape Architecture Jory Johnson
  5. The Architecture of Monuments Thomas,H.Creighton
  6. Design Quarterly v.141 Sculprture and Garden : A Historical Overview Marc Treib
  7. 서초문화예술공원 서초구
  8. 해체주의 건축 필립 존슨;마크 위그리(편저);이일형(공역);김능현(공역)