Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Consumer's Choice Behavior of National Parks

소비자의 국립공원 선택행동에 관한 연구

  • Published : 1996.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between desired recreation experiences recreational context and environmental attributes that influence the choice of national park in which to recreate. Eight hundred and five visitors in three national park in which to recreate. Eight hundred and five visitors in three national parks were surveyed. Seven recreational experience domains and four homogeneous groups were identified. The contributions of environmental attributes homogeneous groups were identified. The contributions of environmental attributes to the choice of national park were found to differ among four groups, and across recreational context such as past experience, membership, and the length of visit. The implications for national park management were discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. 숲과 문화 v.3 no.3 국립공원-이상과 실제: 한국에서 실현가능한 국립공원 형태의 추구 윤영일
  2. In Forest and River Recreation: Research Update Using desired recreation experiences to predict setting preferences Brown, P. J.;D. M. Ross
  3. J. of Forestry v.80 no.2 Recreation opportunity spectrum approach to resource planning Buist L. J.;T. A. Hoots
  4. USDA For. Serv. Item pool for scales designated to quantify the psychological outcomes desired and expected from recreation participation Driver B. L.
  5. In Elements of Outdoor Recreation Planning Toward a behavioral interpretation of recreation with implications for planning Driver B. L.;S.R. Tocher
  6. In Proc. of the Integrated Renewable Resource Inventories Workshop The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories: A rationale Driver B. L.;P. J. Brown
  7. J. of Lei. Res. v.20 no.3 Integrating Activity Patterns into Destination Choice Models Fesenmaier D. R.
  8. Multivariate Data Analysis Hair Jr. J. F.;R. E. Anderson;R. L. Tatham;W. C. Black
  9. In Behavior and the Natural Environment Recreational needs and behavior in natural settings Knopf R. C.
  10. Lei. Sci. v.5 Motives for recreational river floating: Relative consistency across settings Knopf R. C.;G. L. Peterson;E. C. Leatherberry
  11. J. of Lei. Res. v.15 no.3 A test of concepts inherent in experience based setting management for outdoor recreation areas Manfredo M. J.;B. L. Driver;P. J. Brown
  12. In Proceedings - Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior Choosing recreation settings: Processes, findings, and research directions McCool S. F;G. H. Stankey;R. N. Clark
  13. Psychometric theory Nunnally J. C
  14. Lei. Sci. v.6 A novice isn't necessarily a novice: the influence of use history on subjective perception recreation participation Schreyer R.;D. W. Lime
  15. J. of Lei. res. v.18 no.4 Attribute preferences for recreation settings Schreyer R.;J. T. Beaulieu
  16. Spss for Windows: Professional Statistics Release 5 SPSS Inc.
  17. In Forest and River Recreation: Research Update no.18 The role of informationin recreation site selection Stynes D. J.
  18. Lei. Sci. v.11 Activities, experiences, and environmental setting: a case study of recreation opportunity spectrum relationships Virden R. J.;R. C. Knopf
  19. In Proceedings - Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior A developmental model of recreation site choice Williams D. R.
  20. Environment and Behavior v.17 no.3 In search of the primitive-urban continuum: the dimensional structure of outdoor recreation settings Williams D. R.;R. C. Knopf
  21. J. of Lei. Res. v.22 no.1 The effect of experience use history on the multidimensional structure of motivations to participate in leisure activities Williams D. R.;R. Schreyer;R. C. Knopf
  22. Water Resources v.21 no.5 River recreation experience opportunity in two recreation opprtunity spectrum(ROS) classes Wollmuth D. C.;J. H. Schomaker;L. C. Merriam Jr.
  23. Lei. Sci. v.11 The For camper's experience preference differences among three ROS setting classes Yuan M. S.;D. McEwen