Problems and Amelioration Measures of the Assessment on Terrestrial Ecosystem Field in Environmental Impact Statement

환경영향평가서에 나타난 육상생태분야의 평가에 대한 문제점과 개선방안

  • Koh, Kang-Suk (Environmental Health Research Department National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Suh, Min-Hwan (Environmental Health Research Department National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kang, In-Goo (Environmental Health Research Department National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 고강석 (국립환경연구원 환경보건연구부) ;
  • 서민환 (국립환경연구원 환경보건연구부) ;
  • 강인구 (국립환경연구원 환경보건연구부)
  • Published : 1995.06.10

Abstract

This study was carried out to find the problems of assessment on terrestrial ecosystem part in environmental impact analysis(EIA) and to suggest the proper amelioration measures by analyzing 19 environmental impact statements(EIS) published during the period from 1991 to 1994. The results obtained from this study were as follows. Field survey for the investigation of fauna and flora in project areas should be conducted at least 3 times a year and name of investigator should be written on the EIS clearly. Increase or decrease in degree of green naturality and productivity cannot be an absolute criteria for expressing the amount of changes in ecosystem. Evaluation for the ecosystems and their composition in project area is more important than presenting merely the increase or decrease in degree of green naturality and productivity. Alleviation measures in 19 EISs analyzed in this study were summarized into 6 types: They are establishment of landscape plan, transplanting of useful trees preservation of big tree and protected species, restoration and preservation of existent vegetation, establishment of soil conservation measures and diminution of the impact on animal. However, they were somewhat insufficient because they wouldn't suggest the alleviation measures in detail. The more positive counter-proposals are needed to decrease the impact of the project on terrestrial ecosystem.

Keywords