HISTOPATHOLOGIC STUDY OF FURCATION PERFORATIONS REPAIRED WITH SOME MATERIALS

치근이개부 천공부위에 대한 수종수복재의 치유효과에 관한 조직병리학적 연구

  • Hong, Han-Pyo (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DanKook University) ;
  • Hong, Chan-Ui (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DanKook University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hoon (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DanKook University)
  • 홍한표 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 홍찬의 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 신동훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 1995.09.10

Abstract

Perforations especially in the furcations during endodontic treatment have notably detrimental effect on prognosis. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographically and histologically the sealing ability and the tissue responses of amalgam, Ketac-Silver, IRM, Vitapex, and mineral trioxide aggregate(MTA) used to repair furcation perforations. Thirty two experimental furcation perforations were created in the mandibular premolars of 6 mongrel dogs and immediately repaired with experimental materials. The animals were sacrificed after 16 weeks and radiographic and histopathologic results were evaluated. The following conclusions were drawn within the limits of the experimental results; 1. All materials tested in this experiment revealed a certain degree of extrusion into the periodontal space. 2. Both amalgam and Ketac-Silver showed the greatest degree of inflammation and bone resorption(p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the amalgam and Ketac-Silver groups. 3. Both IRM and Vitapex showed a markedly milder degree of inflammatin and less bone resorption than amalgam or ketac-siver(p<0.00005). both IRM and vitapex showed the same respone. 4. MTA showed the least degree of Inflammation and bone resorption(p<0.05). The results of this experiment indicate that among the different materials tested, MTA appeared to be the best material for sealing furcation perforations, although the radiographic and histopathologic differences between the MTA and Vitapex groups were not statistically significant. But further studies with a larger sample are needed to have the exact conclusions.

Keywords