COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE MACROSCOPIC FINDING, CONVENTIONAL TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING IN LOCATING THE MANDIBULAR CANAL

하악관 위치 분석시 일반단층사진과 전산화단층사진의 비교연구

  • Choi Hang-Moon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • You Dong-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 최항문 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실) ;
  • 유동수 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실)
  • Published : 1995.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was comparision of conventional tomography with reformatted computed tomography for dental implant in locating the mandibular canal. Five dogs were used and after conventional tomographs and reformatted computed tomographs were taken, four dentist traced all films. Mandibles were sectioned with 2mm slice thickness and the sections were then radiographed(contact radiography). Each radiographic image was traced and linear measurements were made from mandibular canal to alveolar crest, buccal cortex, lingual cortex, and inferior border. Following results were acquired : 1. Reformatted computed tomographs were exacter than conventional tomography by alveolar crest to canal length of -0.6mm difference between real values and radiographs. 2. The average measurements of buccal cortex to mandibular canal width and lingual cortex to mandibular canal width of conventional tomographs were exacter than reformatted computed tomographs, but standard deviations were higher than reformatted computed tomographs. 3. Standard deviations of reformatted computed tomographs were lower than conventional tomographs at all comparing sites 4. At reformatted computed tomography 62.5% of the measurements performed were within. : filmm of the true value, and at conventional tomography 24.1% were. 5. Mandibular canal invisibiity was 0.8% at reformatted computed tomography and 9.2% at conventional tomography. Reformatted computed tomography has been shown to be more useful radiographic technique for assessment of the mandibular canal than conventional tomography.

Keywords