Inhibitory Mechanism of Propranolol on the Effects of VIP in Peripheral Blood T-lymphocytes of Rat

흰쥐 말초혈액 T-림프구에서 Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide의 효과에 대한 Propranolol의 억제 기전

  • Ahn, Young-Soo (Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choo, Sung-Yee (Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Dong-Won (Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hun (Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 안영수 (연세대학교 의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 추성이 (연세대학교 의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 강동원 (연세대학교 의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 이상헌 (연세대학교 의과대학 약리학교실)
  • Published : 1995.09.30

Abstract

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide(VIP) and ${\beta}-adrenergic$ agonists have immunomodultory effects on the peripheral blood T-lymphocytes of rat through their own receptors. Both of them utilize the same signal transduction pathway. That is, the stimulatory guanine nucleotide binding protein(G protein) mediates the receptor-adenylyl cyclase coupling, producing intracellular increase of cyclic adenosine monophosphate(cAMP). In the previous experiment, propranolol, a ${\beta}-adrenergic$ receptor blocker, inhibited the VIP-induced protein phosphorylation in lymphocytes. However, propranolol could not block the effect induced by forskolin. Therefore, this study was designed to elucidate the mechanism of the inhibitory action of propranolol on the effects of VIP. Using peripheral blood lymphocytes of rats, the effect of propranolol on the receptor binding characteristics of VIP was observed. And the effects of propranolol were compared to the effects of timolol on the cAMP increase induced by isoproterenol, VIP or forskolin. The results obtained are as follows. 1) Receptor binding study showed no significant differences in the affinity or density of VIP receptor between the control and propranolol-pretreated groups. 2) VIP-induced increase of cAMP was inhibited by propranolol, but not by timolol. 3) Both propranolol and timolol suppressed the isoproterenol-induced cAMP increase. 4) Propranolol also inhibited the histamine-induced cAMP increase. 5) Propranolol did not inhibit the increase of cAMP stimulated by forskolin. 6) Lidocaine did not block the VIP-induced cAMP increase. These results show that the inhibitory mechanism of propranolol is not related to ${\beta}-adrenergic$ receptor or its membrane stabilizing effect, and it is suggested that propranolol can block the effects of VIP by inhibiting the intermediate step between the VIP receptor and adenylyl cyclase.

Keywords