THE EFFECTS OF METAL SURFACE TREATMENT ON BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN RESIN AND METAL INTERFACE OF RESIN VENEERED CROWN

레진전장관의 금속면 처리방법 레진과 금속간 접착강도에 미치는 영향

  • Choi Nak-Joon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 최낙준 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 방몽숙 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 1994.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects of various surface treatments on veneering resin to metal bond for Ni-Cr alloy. The metal surfaces were treated as follows, Group 1 : Ground with carborudum point and followed by silicoating Group 2 : Sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide and followed by silicoating Group 3. Sandblasted with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide and followed by silicoating Group 4 : Beaded with $200{\mu}m$ retention structures and followed by silicoating Group 5 : Silicoated in as cast condition Group 6. Beaded with $200{\mu}m$ retention structures only All specimens were veneered with resin. Each group was consisted of 20 specimens. 10 specimens were storaged in $37^{\circ}C$ water for 3 days and the rest 10 specimens were thermocycled 1000 times at temperature of $5^{\circ}C\;to\;55^{\circ}C$. The effects of various surface treatments on the bond strength between resin and metal interface were studied by means of four-point flexure test. The specimens which bad been ground with carborundum point. sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ and $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. beaded with $200{\mu}m$ retention structures and not been treated were observed with SEM. The following results were obtained 1. The bond strength of groups 2, 3, 4 and 6 were higher than the that of groups 1 and 5 (p<0.05) in the case of being storaged in $37^{\circ}C$ water for 3 day and there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength among groups 2, 3, 4 and 6. and between groups 1 and 5 (p>0.05). 2. The bond strength of the case of being thermocycled decreased in the following orders : groups 2, group 4, group 3, group 6, group 1, group 5 and there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength among groups 2, 3 and 4, between groups 1 and 5 (p>0.05). 3. A statistical difference in bond strength of each group between storaged and being thermocycled was demonstrated for group 5 (p<0.05). 4. The treated surfaces of groups 2, 3 and 4 had more fine undercut than that of groups 1 and 5 with SEM.

Keywords