THE EFFECTS OF ROOT TREATMENT WITH CITRIC ACID AND TETRACYCLINE AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION ON THE PERIODONTAL HEALING RESPONSES IN DOGS

성견에서 조직유도재생술과 구연산, 테트라싸이크린으로 치근면 처치한 경우 치주조직의 치유에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Ju-Hwan (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Damkook University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Yeo (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Damkook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Dept. of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Damkook University)
  • 김주환 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김종여 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 1994.04.30

Abstract

The ultimate goal of periodontal therapy is to fully reconstruct the periodontal attachment apparatus. Commonly used techniques for treatment of infrabony defects include a combination of root planing, curettage and root treatment. To prevent the apical migration of epithelial cells, the technique of guided tissue regeneration is used. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of root treatment with Citric acid & Tetracycline and Guided tissue regeneration in dogs. Experimental periodontitis was induced by the ligation of orthodontic elastic threads in the upper right and left premolars 3, 4 of five adult dogs for 6 weeks. 4 types of procedures were performed as follows; 1) Control graup : Mucoperiosteal flap 2) Experinental I : GTR used Gore-tex(R) membrane 3) Experinental II : Root treatment with citric acid (PHl) 4) Experinental III : Root treatment with tetracycline HCl (50mg/ml) There after, dogs were serially sacrificed at the 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 weeks, and the specimens were prepared, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the light microscopic evaluation. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Junctional epithelium reached to the notch through the furcation area in control group at 8 weeks. 2. In the aspects of the inflammatory cell infiltration, control group showed severe aggregation than experimental group I, II, III through the experimental period 3. New cementum was observed over the notch from 5 weeks in experimental group II 4. In the aspects of the amount of new bone formation, experimental group was better than control group, but there was not significant differences among the experimental group, I, II, III

Keywords