Analysis of Radiation Field and Block Pattern for Optimal Size in Multileaf Collimator

치료조사면 및 블록 유형분석을 통한 적정 다엽 콜리메이터 규모에 관한 연구

  • Ahn, Seoung-Do (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Yang, Kwang-Mo (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Yi, Byong-Yong (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Choi, Eun-Kyong (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Chang, Hye-Sook (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
  • 안승도 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울중앙병원 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 양광모 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울중앙병원 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 이병용 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울중앙병원 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 최은경 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울중앙병원 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 장혜숙 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울중앙병원 치료방사선과학교실)
  • Published : 1994.06.01

Abstract

The patterns of the conventional radiation treatment fields and their shielding blocks are analysed to determine the optimal dimension of the MultiLeaf Collimator (MLC) which is considered as an essential tool for conformal therapy. Total 1109 radiation fields from 303 patients (203 from Asan Medical center, 50 from Baek Hosp and 50 from Hanyang Univ. Hosp.) were analysed for this study. Weighted case selection treatment site (from The Korean Society of Therapeutic Radiology 1993). Ninety one percent of total fields have shielding blocks. Y axis is defined as leaf movement direction and it is assumed that MLC is installed on the cranial-caudal direction. The length of X axis were distributed from 4cm to 40cm (less than 21cm for $95\%$ of cases), and Y axis from 5cm to 38cm (less than 22cm for $95\%$ of cases). The shielding blocks extended to less than 6cm from center of the field for $95\%$ of the cases. Start length for ninety five percent of block is less than 10cm for X axis and 11cm for Y axis. Seventy six percent of shielding blocks could be placed by either X or Y axis direction, $7.9\%$ only by Y axis, $5.1\%$ only by X axis and It is reasonable to install MLC for Y direction. Ninety five percent of patients can be treated with coplanar rotation therapy without changing the collimator angle. Eleven percent of cases of cases were impossible to replace with MLC. Futher study of shielding technique is needed for $11\%$ impossible cases. The treatment field dimension of MLC should be larger than $21cm{\times}22cm$. The MLC should be designed as a pair of 21 leaves with 1cm wide for an acceptable resolution and 17cm long to enable the leaf to overtravel at least 6cm from the treatment field center.

Keywords