DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear 3-D behavior of shear-wall dominant RC building structures

  • Balkaya, Can (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana) ;
  • Schnobrich, W.C. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana)
  • Published : 1993.10.25

Abstract

The behavior of shear-wall dominant, low-rise, multistory reinforced concrete building structures is investigated. Because there are no beams or columns and the slab and wall thicknesses are approximately equal, available codes give little information relative to design for gravity and lateral loads. Items which effect the analysis of shear-wall dominant building structures, i.e., material nonlinearity including rotating crack capability, 3-D behavior, slab-wall interaction, floor flexibilities, stress concentrations around openings, the location and the amount of main discrete reinforcement are investigated. For this purpose 2 and 5 story building structures are modelled. To see the importance of 3-D modelling, the same structures are modelled by both 2-D and 3-D models. Loads are applied first the vertical then lateral loads which are static equivalent earthquake loads. The 3-D models of the structures are loaded in both in the longitudinal and transverse directions. A nonlinear isoparametric plate element with arbitrarily places edge nodes is adapted in order to consider the amount and location of the main reinforcement. Finally the importance of 3-D effects including the T-C coupling between walls are indicated.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (1989), "Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary." (ACJ 318-89), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, 73-74, 218,242.
  2. Aejaz, A. Wight, J.K. (1990), "Reinforced concrete structural walls with staggered opening configurations under reversed cyclic loading.", Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Michigan Univ., Report 90-05.
  3. Aejaz, A. Wight, J.K. (1991), "RC structural walls with staggered door openings.", J. Structural Engrg. ASCE, 117(5), 1514-1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:5(1514)
  4. ASCE Committee on Concrete and Masonry Structures (1982), "Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete." State-of-the-Art Report, ASCE Special Publication, New York.
  5. Citipitioglu, E. Nicolas, V.T. (1979), "Mapping distortion in isoparametric finite element formulation and mesh generation.", Methodes Numeriques Dans les Science De lingenieur, G.A.M.N.I., Dunod, Bordes, Paris, France.
  6. Cope, R.J. and Rao, P.V. (1977), "Nonlinear finite element analysis of slab structures.", Proceedings, Institution of Civil Engineers, Londen, Part 2, 63(3), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1977.3299
  7. El-Mezaini, N. and Citipitioglu, E. (1991), "Finite element analysis of prestressed and reinforced concrete structures.", J. Structural Engrg, ASCE. 117(10), 2851-2864. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:10(2851)
  8. Gallegos-Cazares, S. and Schnobrich W.C. (1988), "Effects of creep and shrinkage on the behavior of reinforced concrete gable roof hyperbolic-paraboloids.", Structural Research Series 543, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  9. Gerstle, K.H. (1981), "Material modelling of reinforced concrete.", IABSE Colloquium DELF, Introductory Report, 33, 41-61.
  10. Gupta, A.K. and Akbar, H. (1984), "Cracking in reinforced concrete analysis.", J. Structural Engrg., ASCE, 110(8), 1735-1746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:8(1735)
  11. Hu, H.T. Schnobrich, W.C. (1990), "Nonlinear analysis of cracked reinforced concrete.", ACI Struct. J., 87(2).
  12. Milford, R.V. and Schnobrich, W.C. (1985), "The application of the rotating crack model to the analysis of reinforced concrete shells.", Comput. Struct. 20, 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(85)90071-9
  13. Naeim, F. (1989), "The seismic design handbook" Structural Engineering Series, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 119-141,142-170,210-230.
  14. Okamura, H. and Maekawa, K. (1990), "Non-linear analysis and constitutive models of reinforced concrete.", Proc. of SCI-C, Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Pinerdge Press, April, 831-850.
  15. "POLO-FINITE: A Structural Mechanics System for Linear and Nonlinear, Static and Dynamic Analysis". User Manual, Civil Engrg. Dept.,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagin.
  16. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1982), "The response of reinforced concrete to in-plane shear and normal stresses.", Publications 82-03, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Toronto.
  17. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1986), "The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.", ACI Struct. J., Proceedings, 83(2), 219-231.
  18. Wood, S.L., Wight, J.K. and Moehle, J.P. (1987), "The 1985 Chile Earthquake observations on earthquakeresistant construction in Vina Del Mar.", Structural Research Series No.532, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Cited by

  1. Nonlinear seismic response evaluation of tunnel form building structures vol.81, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00434-0
  2. Estimation of fundamental periods of shear-wall dominant building structures vol.32, pp.7, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.258
  3. Seismic vulnerability, behavior and design of tunnel form building structures vol.26, pp.14, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.005
  4. ON INTER-STOREY DRIFT LIMITATION OF STEEL–CONCRETE HYBRID STRUCTURES FOR TALL BUILDINGS vol.04, pp.01, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431110000595
  5. Three-Dimensional Effects on Openings of Laterally Loaded Pierced Shear Walls vol.130, pp.10, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1506)